What Went Unsaid at the Banker Grilling

Heather Horn Jan 14, 2010
We already covered the highlights of what did happen when the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission grilled bankers yesterday. But what didn't? Here's what financial crisis-watchers think went glaringly unspoken in yesterday's attempt to plumb the causes of collapse.
  • Fannie and Freddie "No witnesses from either of those major players in the subprime meltdown" were brought before the commission, notices the National Review's Iain Murray.
  • Citigroup Likewise, "it was hard not to notice," writes The New Yorker's James Surowiecki, "the absence of Vikram Pandit, the C.E.O. of Citigroup." Though Pandit "only took over Citigroup in late 2007, by which point the groundwork for the crisis had long since been laid," Surowiecki thinks the absence "did feel a bit like an implicit commentary on Citigroup's much-diminished status."
  • Apologies Commission member Phil Angelides "asked [Goldman CEO Lloyd] Blankfein to elaborate on his statement last year that 'we participated in things that were clearly wrong, and we have reasons to regret and apologize for.' Blankfein was not inclined to revisit this subject," notes The Washington Post's Dana Milbank scornfully. "He acknowledged that the firm 'contributed to elements of froth in the market.'"
  • A Confirmation that the Crisis Was Caused by Moral Hazard "One of the more remarkable moments," says James Surowiecki, "came when Jamie Dimon, the C.E.O. of J.P. Morgan, said that his bank had never tested its portfolio against the possibility that housing prices would fall." If J.P. Morgan didn't test, others probably didn't either, Surowiecki argues. That means, points out the Free Exchange blog at The Economist--widely acknowledged to be the work of Ryan Avent--that if the bankers "couldn't conceive" of a housing market collapse, they also probably weren't figuring the government would bail them out if it happened. That, in turn, means that assumption of government bailout didn't lead banks to take undue risks--moral hazard may not have been a big factor.
  • A Promise to Undo Bonuses "Everybody who's getting a bonus this year will be able to keep it," adds Fortune's Stanley Bing.

Want to add to this story? Let us know in comments or send an email to the author at hhorn at theatlantic dot com. You can share ideas for stories on the Open Wire.

Sources

Related Articles   More by Heather Horn

Feinberg Backpedals on Pay Caps for AIG

Did Scott Brown Secure the Way for Financial Reform?

Will C-Suite Heads Roll at Goldman Sachs?

 

Vanessa Grigoriadis: What I Read

What the World Makes of Rick Perry

Elsewhere on the Web

User Comments

Please type your comment and click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be prompted to log in or register

  • The Atlantic Wire on Twitter
  • The Atlantic Wire RSS Feed
  • The Atlantic Wire iPhone App