Yet they can agree on at least one thing: Obama is letting big bankers off too easily. Both are aghast at the president's nonchalance about the JPMorgan Chase and Goldman Sachs CEO bonuses. "Oh. My. God." writes an excitable Krugman, as Obama continues to fall short of liberal expectations. "These bank executives," he explains, "are not free agents who are earning big bucks in fair competition; they run companies that are essentially wards of the state." Thus, "at the very least, you would think that Obama would understand the importance of acknowledging public anger over what’s happening."
"I agree with Paul Krugman," announces Kristol, not mincing words. "If Obama's idea of moving to the middle politically is to embrace Wall Street's too-big-to-fail banks, he's crazy." Here's why:
Usually Republicans are the party of Big Business and Democrats of Big Government, and the public's hostility to both more or less evens the politics out. But if Obama now becomes the spokesman for Big Government intrusiveness and the apologist for Big Business irresponsibility all at once--good luck with that.
Want to add to this story? Let us know in comments
or send an email to the author at
hhorn at theatlantic dot com.
You can share ideas for stories on the Open Wire.
Heather Horn


User Comments
Please type your comment and click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be prompted to log in or register