The U.S. economy gained 431,000 jobs in May. Fantastic, right? Not so fast, say many economics and policy commentators. It turns out
95% of those jobs were "Census hirings," and thus temporary. Put
together with the realization that it took billions of stimulus dollars to producers those numbers, bloggers are beginning to wonder: is this jobs gain even good news at all?
- 'Big Disappointment,' says the MSNBC First Read
team. "Officials and analysts privately expected somewhere between
100,000 and 150,000 private-sector jobs on top of the Census hirings,
translating to, perhaps, 80% of the jobs created this month as Census.
Without more private sector growth this summer, it could mean some
rough NEGATIVE job months once the Census hires disappear."
- 'Anemic on the Surface,' declares economics analyst Mike Shedlock,
"and even worse with a close inspection of the details." The "hype"
from administration officials and their ilk makes it even more
- How It Affects Politics: Here's the Real 'Katrina' Mother Jones's Andy Kroll
has the takeaway for the White House. "On the one hand, the
administration can update its much-publicized, color-coded job-creation
chart to show more growth in May," he writes. But officials know how
superficial these successes are. "I wouldn't expect to see the
administration openly touting today's report." Reuters's Felix Salmon goes further:
unemployment to remain over 9% through the midterm elections--compared
to a rate of just 6.9% in November 2008, when Obama was elected. It's
that number, rather than anything going on right now in the Gulf of
Mexico, which is really "Obama's Katrina".
- 'A Good Report, with Two Dark Linings,' The New York Times' David Leonhardt calls it, the two caveats being (1) the Census jobs, and (2) that "the economy is a very long way from being healthy." He also notes,
based on the breakdown, that "one of the more surprising aspects of the
recent recession is how well wages have held up ... In this recession
... most workers who have kept their jobs have not had to take a pay
cut." That said, he realizes that the load of bad news in this report
could signal "a slowdown in hiring because businesses are worried about
the state of the economy."
- What Are You Talking About? The
report is "depressing, coming in well below lofty expectations, and
having no silver lining" counters Reuters's Felix Salmon. 24/7 Wall St.'s Jon Ogg concurs: "A disaster… That is all that can be used to describe (politely) the May jobs data." Meanwhile, Bill McBride
at Calculated Risk unloads a ton of graphs based on the employment
report, which other bloggers eagerly snatch up. None of the graphs are
- Confirmed: 'We're Falling Into a Double-Dip Recession' Robert Reich,
Berkeley public policy professor and former secretary of labor,
translates the report simply as the following: "the labor market
continues to deteriorate." He says in the short term, we need "more
stimulus" and " in the longer term, we need a new New Deal that will
bolster America’s floundering middle class." Without that, there's no
way to break the vicious cycle of decreased spending leading to
businesses creating fewer jobs leading to decreased spending. Left-leaner Harold Meyerson at The Washington Post, unsurprisingly, agrees: "Today’s jobs figures should dispel any notion that slamming the brakes on government fiscal stimulus is a good idea."
Want to add to this story? Let us know in comments
or send an email to the author at
hhorn at theatlantic dot com.
You can share ideas for stories on the Open Wire.