For years, politicians
in Washington assailed
the Chinese government for
undervaluing its yuan (a.k.a Renminbi) currency. It put American exports at a
disadvantage and widened the U.S. trade deficit, they charged. Then,
over the weekend, Chinese officials made a surprise announcement
saying they would
increase the "flexibility" of its currency. The remarks were met with skepticism
until today when the
currency appreciated by 0.42 percent
largest appreciation in five years. Is China keeping good on its promise?
- Change Is Coming in China, writes an optimistic Gady Epstein at Forbes: "China is
saying that it has weathered the worst of the global financial crisis,
and that it will no longer use the crisis and fears of instability as an
excuse to fix the RMB to the dollar. That is a hopeful message."
Very Mature Move, writes Peter Boockvar at the Big Picture:
"Bottom line, today's move is more symbolic than anything because the
revaluation of the yuan will be very gradual and not one off but it is a
very important step in China's maturation and global economic
relevance... To those critics in the US of China's fixed peg, be careful
now of what you wished for. The Renminbi has taken a big step to being a
global reserve currency and smaller trade imbalances will mean less
Chinese purchases of US Treasuries. At last count they own $900b worth."
Politicking By China, writes Mike Shedlock at Global Economic
Trend Analysis. Ahead of the upcoming G-20 summit, China faced strong
opposition for its devalued currency. This small concession was designed
to stifle critics, argues Shedlock: "Whether this buys China some time
with the protectionists in Congress remains to be seen. However, it is
clear that China played its hand as good as conceivable possible with an
extremely tough hard-line stance, followed up a day later with seemingly
large concession. Had China not played these games, no one would have
been impressed with a pissy .37 percent move. Now, everyone is going
- A Floating Currency Is in China's Best Interest, writes
Michael Schuman at Time: "In my
opinion, any change in yuan policy that brings into play any degree of
flexibility is a good one - especially for China. A more rationally
determined yuan will help China make that difficult but crucial
adjustment from an invest-and-export economic model to one based more on
domestic demand. It will also give Beijing another tool by which it can
moderate inflation. China also clearly wants the yuan to play a bigger
role in world trade and finance, and a more market-based valuation
system will be an absolute necessity to make that happen."
Is Already Taking Credit for the Appreciation, writes Marc Ambinder at The Atlantic:
"U.S. officials... are already trumpeting the move as a sign that U.S.
diplomatic engagement with China helped to precipitate the policy
change, which has long been desired by the West, and particularly by
China's debtor nations."
- This Is Just a Ploy, writes Gordan Chang at The Daily Beast.
Before the currency appreciated Monday, Chang expressed deep skepticism
over China's intentions: "Despite the signals from the Chinese capital,
don't expect the yuan's value to change much in coming months...Beijing
has staked out a position, and it will be difficult to retreat from it. A
quick appreciation of the renminbi is unlikely because the Politburo
Standing Committee, China's ruling body, is sending its most
anti-Western member, General Secretary Hu Jintao, to Canada this week."
Stronger Yuan? Here's Who Wins and Loses, writes Jill Schlesinger at CBS News:
"Winners would include: U.S. exporters (whose goods will be valued
more fairly); U.S. trade deficit (which could narrow on a more equitable
exchange rate); U.S. employment (which could rise); the Chinese economy
(which can't rely solely on exports to fuel its growth); Chinese
consumers (who will have an opportunity to buy global goods); and
potentially, Chinese citizens (who could benefit from more government
spending at home, because China no longer would have to spend as much
money maintaining the artificial currency level). Losers would
include: U.S. consumers (who could pay more for China-made goods);
U.S. importers (who purchase Chinese goods and sell them in the U.S.);
and in the short-term, bears who bet against a stock market rally today
after two consecutive weeks of gains."
Want to add to this story? Let us know in comments
or send an email to the author at
jhudson at theatlantic dot com.
You can share ideas for stories on the Open Wire.