Contrarian Web magazine Slate certainly has its critics, but none would compare it to a terrorist magazine--leave it to a Slate writer to do that. On Monday, Brian Palmer
argued that al-Qaeda's Web publication Sada al-Malahim isn't "all that different" from Slate. Why? Palmer observes that Sada al-Malahim's "content is separated out into various departments and rubrics--like 'Martyr Biographies,' which recount the life stories of suicide bombers." Like Slate, the magazine features articles "penned by notable figures, like Nasser al-Wahishi, a former secretary to Osama bin Laden." The aspiring terrorist and intelligence officer must-read even has, he points out, "an Explainer-like feature that answers reader questions about current topics in jihadism. (Here's one: The prophet commanded us to expel infidels from the Arabian Peninsula. Which countries was he referring to?)"
But there are, perhaps, a couple of differences. Sada al-Malahim runs a much leaner business, for starters, lacking a central office and probably relying on unpaid contributors. But as Palmer observes, this involves a familiar tradeoff, where cost-cutting diminishes quality, resulting in "more misspellings and grammatical errors than you might see in a commercial magazine."
Want to add to this story? Let us know in comments
or send an email to the author at
hhorn at theatlantic dot com.
You can share ideas for stories on the Open Wire.