Trevor Butterworth wasn't the first to write a "slow word" manifesto (see: the Wall Street Journal's "Manifesto for Slow Communication
" last August), but in the midst of a meditative essay for Forbes
he made one mistake: calling out Gawker's gossipy "vision of the world." Butterworth's overall point was touting "the idea of consuming less, but better, media." But Gawker writer Hamilton Nolan answered Butterworth's piece with a harsher manifesto
of his own:
The primary problem with manifestos is that the designation of any
written work as a "manifesto" is an uncannily accurate predictor of
unearned authorial pretensions of grandeur.
Nolan thumps Butterworth for failing to promote book-reading, dismisses the idea that his site has "a vision," and asserts that Gawker's style is a descendant of Mark Twain's. See for yourself:
Mark Twain, for example, would have been a great Gawker writer...We're still doing the same shit almost 150 years later. There's yer slow-word movement.
Want to add to this story? Let us know in comments
or send an email to the author at
bcarlson at theatlantic dot com.
You can share ideas for stories on the Open Wire.