- Holden No Typical Teen Guardian's Theo Hobson takes issue with the usual characterization of Holden-as-Everyteen, arguing that Holden's particular neuroses are what gives Catcher its power. "The novel is not about teenage angst in general. At its heart is this very specific experience of feeling spiritually threatened by the power of sexual peer-pressure, this fear that sexual maturity entails a sacrifice of one's moral integrity."
- Holden's Middle Path Doesn't Exist Anymore At a New York Times literary roundtable, Elizabeth Wurtzel wonders whether Catcher is relevant to a generation of overachievers and burnouts. "The world now is so much more dangerous, the temptations so much darker than anything Holden could have encountered, that kids are either L7-square or they're just messed up. The chance to be a tiny bit wild and crazy in the teenybopper tradition is not part of what we know."
- Schools Have Domesticated Catcher Educators have defanged Catcher by putting it on the required reading list, argues Mark Borigini at Psychology Today. But he's not sure it was ever a masterwork of subversion: "Holden Caulfield is a rich kid, who blew an opportunity at a prep school; he seems a bit phony, a lot spoiled... and those of us who read [this novel] fall into the trap set by the phonies."
- One Kid Can't Speak for Millions At American Thinker, Selwyn Duke is skeptical about the way Salinger depicts precocity. "I didn't experience teen 'angst,' and I didn't think everyone was a phony, either... In fact, I think the young are better epitomized by a starry-eyed idealism, where they expect some virtue, heroism, and idealism in others. For sure, the millions of youths who chanted 'yes, we can!' in 2008 expected those things."
Want to add to this story? Let us know in comments or send an email to the author at aeichler at theatlantic dot com. You can share ideas for stories on the Open Wire.



User Comments
Please type your comment and click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be prompted to log in or register