How do other people
deal with the torrent of information that pours down on us all? Do they
have some secret? Perhaps. We are asking various friends and colleagues
who seem well-informed to describe their media diets. This is from a
conversation with Michael Lewis, author, Bloomberg columnist, and
contributing editor to Vanity Fair
.I
don’t really have news-reading habits. My consumption of news is always
configured around everything else going on in my life. In a normal work
day, I won’t actually look at a newspaper until nighttime. I take the Wall Street Journal and the New York Times
to
bed with me and I flip through them. I’m entranced with David Brooks—I
always read his column. I’m also pretty interested in Paul Krugman’s.
The papers are already old news by the time I look at them, though.
The news I get early is all online. I glance at the
Times, the
New Orleans Time-Picayune (I grew up in New Orleans), and the
San Francisco Chronicle
(I live in Berkeley) for a total of about 15 minutes. It’s more
skimming than reading articles from beginning to end. Then I usually
flip onto my Bloomberg machine and look at the pieces that are most
read and most sent throughout the financial community. I look at the
front page for Bloomberg terminal users.
After
that, I use the news to procrastinate. If I’m writing something, or
doing whatever it is I’m supposed to be doing, I’ll flip onto some
website. I have quick links on my browser to
Slate, the
Wall Street Journal website, and
ESPN. I probably flip onto ESPN five times a day, for pure procrastination.
I
don’t tweet, I don’t Twitter, I couldn’t even tell you how to read or
where to find a Twitter message. I don’t actually see the point of
limiting communication to a haiku. I find the whole effusion of
communications technology bewildering. All you have to do is overhear a
certain number of cell phone conversations to see that the vast
majority of what people say and write to each other is totally
pointless. I have an email address and I’m thinking of shutting that
down. It’s amazing how overly accessible people are. There’s a lot of
communication in my life that’s not enriching, it’s impoverishing. I
really do like consuming news on the web, though. That has been a
useful addition to my life, especially financial news. I look at
aggregation sites sometimes, like
RealClearMarkets.
It’s run by libertarians, clearly, but they do drag in everything
that’s written about finance. For sports analysis, I’ll look at
Baseball Prospectus and
Football Outsiders.
I
listen to NPR some, though I don’t watch any TV news. If I watch TV
it’s either sports or HBO dramas. I subscribe to a lot of magazines: The
New Republic, the New York Review of Books, the London Review of Books, the New Yorker, The Believer, and Vanity Fair (well, I get Vanity Fair for free because I write for it). As
a kid I used to read one book and if I started it, I finished it. Now,
I bet I have 17 books piled on my bedside table. I’m currently two
thirds of the way through Oliver Twist and am planning on picking up Don Quixote when I’m done with that. I’m reading
Kahneman and Tversky’s papers and I have a few kids’ books piled up as well.
Actually,
if you were to draw a pie chart of where I get news from, I bet I get a
third from whatever people in Berkeley—specifically the parents’ at my
kids’ school—are outraged about. I’m surrounded by people who are alive
to what’s going on in the world and who are quick to be outraged by it.
Steve Coll: What I Read (2/24)Nicholas Lemann: What I Read (2/22)
James Gibney: What I Read (2/9)
Ta-Nehisi Coates: What I Read (2/5)
Jeffrey Goldberg: What I Read (2/4)
Marc Ambinder: What I Read (2/2)
Want to add to this story? Let us know in comments.
You can share ideas for stories on the Open Wire.
User Comments
Please type your comment and click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be prompted to log in or register