Barely two years after Eliot Spitzer resigned in disgrace, New York looks set to lose
yet another governor to scandal. David Paterson, like Spitzer, was the target
of a massive New York Times scoop
that won the newspaper applause. But on Monday Newser columnist Michael Wolff
turns the cannon back on the Gray Lady:
is the New York Times who helped force Spitzer, the elected governor,
out of office and made possible the various calamities of the unelected
next governor. And it is the Times that has now made it impossible for
Paterson to do his job--even if, in fact, he was competent enough to do
Many have celebrated the Spitzer and Paterson exposés as
brilliant investigative journalism--a service performed for the public.
But Wolff argues that "from almost any reasonable measure, we are now
in a significantly worse-off position then we were before the New York
Times turned its attention on the governor's office." He casts suspicion on the real "story behind the story" of why the newspaper "came to dispose of two governors."
Want to add to this story? Let us know in comments
or send an email to the author at
hhorn at theatlantic dot com.
You can share ideas for stories on the Open Wire.