This may or may not be an April Fool's joke, but it certainly wouldn't
be the most bizarre thing we've ever heard: 20th Century Fox has
reportedly greenlit a movie based on the "talking baby" ad campaign for
the financial services company E*Trade. The commercials feature
CGI-brushed babies speaking into webcams in adult voices about the
wonders of E*Trade, as well as other subjects babies don't generally
take an interest in, such as girlfriends and golf. According to a March 30 post
at the pop-culture blog Pajiba, Katie Dippold, a writer for Parks and
Recreation and MADtv, will be responsible for the film's screenplay,
and the plot will concern "a group of talking babies trying to make
their way across the playground." Among entertainment journalists, no
small amount of retching has ensued.
Everything About This Is Wrong Nathan Rabin,
the caustic head writer of The A.V. Club, doesn't mince words: "If you
enjoy creepily sexualized anthropomorphic babies who talk and act like
asshole thirty-somethings... then boy are you in for a treat." Calling
the commercials "viscerally unnerving yet inexplicably successful,"
Rabin confesses that the news of an E*Trade feature film leaves him
"deeply dispirited and ashamed of humanity."
Part of a Surprisingly Rich TraditionMovie blogger Colin Boyd provides an impressive bibliography of talking-baby entertainment, reaching past the obvious precedent of Look Who's Talking to cite "the weird Ally McBeal dancing baby" and "Baby Bob... a talking infant that pitched Freeinternet.com" nearly a decade ago. (Unaccountably, he overlooks the seminal 1999 work Baby Geniuses.) Still, ultimately Boyd blames "Look Who's Talking, Too... the sequel that showed people you didn't even have to make talking babies funny to justify 90 minutes of our time."
Move Over, Geico Cavemen! booms Erik Davis
at Cinematical. Jubilant headline aside, he's not very happy about this news: "Apparently
Hollywood didn't learn that taking funny TV commercial gimmicks and
trying to turn them into something bigger (like an actual TV show)
really doesn't work. Part of this has to do with the fact that it's a
blatant gimmick constructed solely to grab your attention for roughly
30-or-so seconds." But take heart, Davis adds: based on what little is
known of the movie's plot, it sounds like "you could pay twenty bucks
to see this sucker in 3D in IMAX theaters, or you can simply head over
to the local day care right after lunch and watch real babies walk (and
crawl) across the playground."
Isn't This a Bit Species-ist?Mark,
the singly-named blogger behind I Watch Stuff, notes that "it should
legitimately be a crime to still be making talking baby movies in 2010.
Particularly when we still have so many animal species that have yet to
be lent a voice through CGI."
Damned Either Way, sighs MaryAnn Johanson
at Flick Filosopher. "Even if this is a put-on, it’s rather telling
that we could be fooled by this, what passes for entertainment having
sunk so low that this is not implausible," she writes. And "if it isn’t
a joke, we’re doomed. Either way, *sob.*"
The Atlantic Wire is your authoritative guide to the news and ideas that matter most right now. Our team tracks newsmakers and opinions across the entire media spectrum: newspapers, web sites, television, radio and magazines.
But we do more than just collect information. By synthesizing, analyzing and summarizing what’s out there, and adding new information when we can, we are a news engine that gives you a quick and valuable account of the issues of the day.