To tell you the truth I don't actually understand how it's got so crazy... It's been business hassles. Not with us, or iTunes. It's the people in the middle, the record label. There have been all sorts of reasons why they don't want to do it.The record label in question is EMI. Its failure to strike a deal with Apple has some outspoken Beatles fans outraged. Case in point: TechCrunch blogger MG Siegler. After brazenly admitting that he's illegally acquired the entire Beatles catalogue, he says it's EMI's "own damn fault."
This is pathetic. It has been over seven years -- let me repeat, 7 years (!) -- since the iTunes Store first launched. Ever since then, there's been no shortage of rumors that The Beatles' catalog would be available on the platform soon. This is both because Apple CEO Steve Jobs (like everyone else) loves them, and because it just makes sense to have the most-popular recording artists of all time on what is now the most popular store (both online and retail) for getting music. But EMI apparently doesn't care about making sense. And, it seems, they care even less about making money...Think about the lost sales The Beatles have seen by not being available on iTunes over these past 7 years? The number of albums and songs that would have been downloaded legally would definitely be in the tens of millions range. Again, the key word is legally. People would have been paying for this music. Tens, maybe hundreds of millions of dollars has likely been lost because of EMI's odd decision to stay out of the online marketplace.
Want to add to this story? Let us know in comments
or send an email to the author at
jhudson at theatlantic dot com.
You can share ideas for stories on the Open Wire.
John Hudson



User Comments
Please type your comment and click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be prompted to log in or register