Coverage of the trial has been thin in the English-speaking
world, and opinions on it few and far between. "The work of despots in
countries of less strategic importance than ?
Individual Criminal Responsibility "Congo is the subject of one of the first investigations by the new International Criminal Court at the Hague," wrote Ishbel Matheson of the London Times in 2006, "and Bemba is squarely in the frame." Even in 2006, the question of "Bemba’s responsibility for his men’s conduct" was seen as being a likely problem in a prosecution. "At stake," wrote Matheson, "is a legal and moral principle that we all have an interest in defending—that of individual criminal responsibility." In a 2008 blog post, Lorenzo Wakefield of the University of the Western Cape’s Community Law Centre noted that the Rwandan Jean Paul Akayesu had based his defense in the International Criminal Tribunal on not having personally raped Tutsi women. Bemba, he wrote, "goes a bit further and alleges that he did not order these crimes by his troops. That is where the possible next generation jurisprudence kicks in."
The Rule of International Law The ICC prosecutor for the Bemba trial, Luis Moreno-Ocampo, recently made a strong case for the trial's importance in a New York Times op-ed. The mission of the
ICC and the Rome Statute that brought it about, he declared, was to "transform
the idea of ending impunity into a reality. During our first year, we found
that the gravest crimes under our jurisdiction were committed in
The Victims Moreno-Ocampo pointed out that with the case of many ICC-sought individuals, "the victims do not have the luxury of time." The victims of Bemba's soldiers, The London Times Toomey reported in 2003, were raped, hacked into pieces, and forced to eat family members' organs. The BBC's Mike Thomson in late 2008 heard the story of a woman gang-raped while lying on the body of her dead husband, who had been shot before her eyes. The trial, Thomson wrote, gave such victims hope.
Some think this hope is already waning. The