Two leading agenda-setters in the Afghanistan War are testifying
before Congress today through Thursday: General Stanley McChrystal, the
top military commander, and Ambassador Karl Eikenberry, who held
McChrystal's job until he became the ambassador to Afghanistan.
McChrystal and Eikenberry will be grilled by Congress's war backers and
war skeptics on everything from troop levels to infrastructure project
to whether we even have a chance. Significantly, the two men have
publicly differed on the war: McChrystal warned of "mission failure"
without 40,000 additional troops and Eikenberry pled with the White
House to send no more troops, citing fears of complicating Afghan
President Hamid Karzai's tenuous rule. But now they must work together
to sell the White House's war. What should Congress ask?
- What Are We Doing For Afghan Self-Governance? Wired's Noah Schachtman lists
13 questions for McChrystal ranging from fuel transport to rules of
engagement. His two best: "You've said the primary mission of ISAF
forces should be to secure the
population. So why are 9,000 of the 30,000 surge troops headed to
largely rural Helmand province? Why are Marines now assaulting the
largely abandoned city of Now Zad?" And, "You've said that training the
Afghan army and police is now the primary
mission there. So why are you devoting only one of the surge brigades
to that task?"
- What's The End-Game? Spencer Ackerman responds
to Schachtman by linking to his post asking if it's containment.
"Dedicated readers know that since March I've been trying to determine
how the Obama administration conceives of the actual endgame in
Afghanistan-Pakistan -- that is, the point at which we can say the
mission is successful," he writes. "But the path out of Afghanistan
articulated by the Obama administration, and reiterated at West Point
on Tuesday, is through a transition to overwatch with the Afghan
security forces. So, once again: could
we be transitioning to Afghan security control in the future, and
sending U.S. and NATO forces home, while the al-Qaeda safe havens in
Pakistan still exist?"
- Pace Of Drawdown? Sen. Claire McCaskill asks fans on her Facebook page to pass along their question. Shawn Gray-Fleek has a sharp one
about what "conditions on the ground" will mean for the July 2011 troop
decrease. He asks, "Since the drawdown -begins- in 2011, what will be
the major factors in determining its pace?"
- Black Jails and Secret Ops Still Going? The American Prospect's Adam Serwer wonders
about Joint Special Operations Command (JSOC), the military special ops
group playing an increasingly large role in Afghanistan and Pakistan,
and the "black jail" at Bagram Air Force Base. The Bagram jail, located
in Afghanistan, has drawn scrutiny and controversy for lengthy and
secretive detention of Afghans.
- Do You Support President Obama's Plan? This
is one that's already answered, just minutes into the testimonty: Both
McChrystal and Eikenberry say yes. Eikenberry, once considered the
skeptic in the room, beamed, "I Can Say Without Equivocation That I Fully Support This Approach." McChrystal expressed total confidence in the strategy, predicting victory. He noted, however, that the July 2011 draw-down date was not his idea.
- What We Still Don't Know Spencer Ackerman, coming out of the first Congressional hearings, lays out the two big unanswered questions. "[F]irst, which southern and eastern Afghan population centers will be
protected by U.S. and allied forces and which won't be; and secondly,
the ultimate aspirational size of Afghan soldiers and police."
Want to add to this story? Let us know in comments
or send an email to the author at
mfisher at theatlantic dot com.
You can share ideas for stories on the Open Wire.