Iran may be working towards a neutron initiator, the "trigger" for a nuclear weapon, reports
the Times of London based on recovered documents dated 2007. If true,
it would mean that, as of 2007, Iran was actively developing the
potential for nuclear weaponry. As the U.S. and other nations strain to
Iran from developing even medical-grade
nuclear material, the
news is a discouraging indicator of Iran's nuclear ambitions.
- Dishonest Iran, Clumsy West The Times of London laments, "The discovery is an indictment both of Iran's duplicity and of the
West's complacency. The Iranian regime has not been a monolithic force
in the 30 years since the revolution. Western diplomats have had to
make fine judgments as to whether the mullahs seek to spread Islamist
revolution throughout the Middle East, or are more concerned to
consolidate the country's status as a leading power in the region."
- There's Your WMD The Washington Times shudders, "The Islamic republic has long argued that its nuclear program is
intended for peaceful purposes, but there is no peaceful use for the
neutron initiator." They write, "The greatest national security challenge that will face the Obama
administration is coming, and Mr. Obama will either shape events or be
shaped by them. He said in Oslo that 'those who seek peace cannot stand
idly by as nations arm themselves for nuclear war.' However, the United
States has been standing idle for years, and time is running out."
- Iran Will Use Nukes as Shield The American Enterprise Institute's Danielle Pletka derides the argument for the containment, which suggests "that once it possesses such a weapon, Iran will neither use it nor
share the technology. But there are few things Iran has not been
willing to share, and it is certain to be tempted to use its nuclear
weapons as a shield from behind which it can engage in adventurism in
Lebanon, Iraq and Israel."
- It's Now About Disarmament The Times of London's Amir Taheri writes, "If the leaked
documents are authenticated, we must assume that the Islamic Republic has
reached the 'threshold' and is beginning to cross it, albeit gingerly. As
long as Iran was suspected of merely moving towards full nuclear
status, the problem the international community faced was one of prevention.
If Iran has crossed the threshold, the problem becomes one of nuclear
disarmament." Taheri writes, "Unwilling to contemplate pre-emptive war, some may believe the only
alternative is pre-emptive surrender. It is not. It is still possible to
raise the cost of Iran's nuclear ambitions by fully applying" sanctions.
Iran's Growing Nuclear Expertise The Washington Post's Joby Warrick reports, "The internal documents and expert analysis point to a growing Iranian
mastery of disciplines including uranium metallurgy, heavy-water
production and the high-precision explosives used to trigger a nuclear
detonation. Although U.S. spy agencies have thought that Iran's leaders
halted research on nuclear warheads in 2003, European and Middle
Eastern analysts point to evidence that Iran has continued to hone its
skills, as recently as 2007."
Sanctions Won't Work The Guardian insists
on diplomatic engagement, citing the Iranian regime's deep political
struggles. "Engagement with the various power centres in Iran does not
automatically entail support for a regime that suppresses domestic
dissent. It could be used to widen the cracks. Smart engagement could
have proved a lot smarter than the sanctions that are about to be
unleashed on a battered and weary nation," they write. "As the regime
sheds legitimacy, there is serious dissent among the
conservative elites about the wisdom of continuing to back President
Want to add to this story? Let us know in comments
or send an email to the author at
mfisher at theatlantic dot com.
You can share ideas for stories on the Open Wire.