A joint U.S.-Pakistan operation has captured Mullah Baradar
, the second-ranking official in the Afghan Taliban. Baradar, the Taliban's de facto military commander
and second to political-ideological chief Mullah Omar, was seized in
Pakistan and is currently under interrogation. His capture marks a
high-profile victory for the war in Afghanistan and a significant blow
to the Taliban. It also advances the possibility of a reconciliation
with the Taliban. What effect could his capture have on the war and the long-term mission for peace and stability in Afghanistan?
- Operational Devastation for Taliban National security think-tanker Michael Cohen beams,
"This has the potential to change the entire complexion of the war in
Afghanistan - and for the better. For the first time in a very long
time, there is reason for optimism." Cohen says "the Taliban may be
losing the military initiative" and will be severely weakened by the
apparent loss of its "safe haven" in parts of Pakistan.
- Risks Radicalizing Taliban The Guardian's Jason Burke notes
that Baradar was relatively moderate and the vacuum his absence leaves
within Taliban leadership may be filled by much nastier elements. "In
removing Baradar, the west may have inadvertently moved the Taliban in
a more extreme direction by strengthening the latter." But Burke thinks
such radicalization "may eventually work to the west's advantage" by
degrading the local support Baradar had earned by his moderate
ultimate point of fighting the Taliban is to compel them to give up
fighting and accept some version of a post-Taliban order in
Afghanistan. Torturing Baradar -- which the Pakistanis have been known
to do -- is counterproductive to that effort. If we treat the guy
respectfully, in a demonstrated way, it might spur a reconsideration of
Taliban goals. I am not counting any chickens, but any hope of a
game-changing possibility will be foreclosed upon if we or our allies
- ...Will It Make Reconciliation Harder? Middle East think-tanker Colin Cookman worries that Baradar's capture "has potential to fragment the movement, make whole-scale reconciliation more difficult even as it degrades capabilities."
- This Isn't About Reconciliation The Economist thinks
U.S. strategy could be to capture more Taliban leaders, rather than
spur their reconciliation. "Mullah Baradar could somehow help in the
apprehension of the Taliban chief, Mullah Omar, and in exposing the
underground Taliban network inside Pakistan." Same with "al-Qaeda
leaders, who are thought to be hiding on the Pakistani side of the
border with Afghanistan."
- Will Successor Be Worse or Weaker? Registan's Joshua Foust asks.
"Much like the assassination of Nek Mohammed is what gave us five years
of Baitullah Mehsud, there is a chance that Baradar's successor will be
much worse. There is also the chance he'll be weaker and less
formidable." Foust is "cautiously optimistic" about the outcome.
"[H]ere is the bottom line: this is a big deal."
Want to add to this story? Let us know in comments
or send an email to the author at
mfisher at theatlantic dot com.
You can share ideas for stories on the Open Wire.