- Clinton: How I'll Modernize NATO In a speech, Secretary Clinton articulated a "common vision for the most successful alliance in history." She stressed a willingness to engage threats from non-state actors, particularly cyberterrorists and pirates off the Horn of Africa, and heralded NATO participation in nation-building missions in Iraq and Afghanistan. "Many threats we face have little or no respect for borders. Whether we're battling piracy, or the menace of terrorism, or the prospect of weapons proliferation, we must be prepared to address new dangers regardless of where they originate." She also emphasized missile defense and energy security.
- Nuclear Non-Proliferation: Pointless Foreign Policy's Stephen Walt sighs, "Both sides will still be left with plenty of nuclear warheads, so the core strategic situation between the two counties won't be affected very much." However, he says an agreement could still have important symbolic value, by showing that the U.S. and Russia care at least somewhat about non-proliferation, and also by proving Clinton's ability to close diplomatic deals.
- Deter Russia's Nuclear Power in Iran The Weekly Standard's Gary Schmitt fumes at Russia's announcement that it will go ahead with plans to help Iran with construction of a nuclear power plant. He insists that Clinton rebuke Russia for the move. "Of course Putin meant to embarrass Clinton. But when it comes to Moscow, the administration happily turns the other cheek."
- Time to Decide Israel-Palestine Path The Washington Independent's Spencer Ackerman says Clinton must choose between looking past Israel's settlement growth or pressuring the Israel government to halt. "Those in the peace camp wonder if the natural impulse to defuse the tension will lead Clinton to paper over the Israeli government’s plans for continuing settlement construction in Jerusalem — or whether she will continue her challenge to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to demonstrate his commitment to peace."
- Some START Progress? Politico's Laura Rozen isn's optimistic about the strategic arms reduction treaty (START) between Russia and the U.S., which is designed to reduce military arms in both nations as part of the ongoing deescalation of tensions between the two nations. Rozen notes that the Obama administration hopes to have this done by the end of 2009 but is still well behind.
- Get Support on Iran Sanctions The Council for Foreign Relations' Stephen Sestanovich says first Russia, then China:
This is now probably the biggest question in the diplomacy of the major powers. And one real uncertainty for the administration is whether you can separate the Chinese and the Russian positions. On the surface, the Russian position looks a lot more constructive than the Chinese. The Russians have said there can be a time when sanctions are necessary, but it's clear that they want a pretty watered down set of sanctions and a new resolution.
Want to add to this story? Let us know in comments or send an email to the author at mfisher at theatlantic dot com. You can share ideas for stories on the Open Wire.



User Comments
Please type your comment and click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be prompted to log in or register