"Many of today's
most-respected thinkers, from Stephen Hawking to David Attenborough,
argue that our efforts to fight climate change and other environmental
perils will all fail unless we 'do something' about population growth."
This, says Fred Pearce
frankly, "is nonsense." Far from surging out of control, population growth is actually slowing, he says. Writing in the British magazine Prospect, Pearce argues that the Western preoccupation with the overpopulation issue isn't just
silly, it's hypocritical:
In fact, rising consumption today
far outstrips the rising headcount as a threat to the planet. And most
of the extra consumption has been in rich countries that have long
since given up adding substantial numbers to their population, while
most of the remaining population growth is in countries with a very
small impact on the planet. By almost any measure you choose, a small
proportion of the world’s people take the majority of the world’s
resources and produce the majority of its pollution.
words, argues Pearce, focus on the population "problem" is essentially
a matter of the rich "downplay[ing] the importance of our own
environmental footprint because future generations of poor people might
one day have the temerity to get as rich and destructive as us." He's not making any exceptions in his condemnation: "Some green activists need to take a long hard look at
Want to add to this story? Let us know in comments
or send an email to the author at
hhorn at theatlantic dot com.
You can share ideas for stories on the Open Wire.