After a turbulent week
for U.S.-Israel relations
, in which Vice President Joe Biden's Israel trip was tarnished by surprise settlement announcements
, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton addressed AIPAC, the largest and most influential pro-Israel lobby in the U.S. The Obama administration's sharp rebuke of Israel's settlement growth has been a point of tension internationally and domestically. Clinton told AIPAC that the relationship with Israel is "rock solid," but that the plan for new settlements "undermines America's unique ability to play a role -- an essential role, I might add -- in the peace process." Here's what commentators are saying:
- Do Jewish Lobbies Represent All Jews? The Atlantic's Jeffrey Goldberg says "the problem with the AIPAC conference" is that it relies so heavily on conservatives. However, "Most American Jews voted for Obama; most American Jews are liberal." So AIPAC does not represent the majority of American Jews. "AIPAC is interested mainly in presenting an oversimplified vision of the Middle
East to its members."
- U.S.-Israel Partnership No Longer Sacrosanct Foreign Policy's Stephen Walt writes in the Washington Post, "Speakers at the AIPAC conference will undoubtedly defend the special
relationship and warn Washington against putting pressure on Israel. But this
short-sighted approach would be a disaster for all sides." For Israel to rebuke U.S. demands on settlements would be to "jeopardize its standing with its most important partner."
- Does Israel Understand U.S. Divisions? The New Yorker's David Remnick worries, "The professionals in Washington and Jerusalem share sufficient diplomatic
agility to paper over this latest unpleasantness, but the memory of the
trivial-seeming aspects of the dispute—the affronts, the lacerating phone
calls—obscures a more unsettling pattern: a deep Israeli misreading of the
President and an ignorance of the diversity of opinion among American Jews and
in the United States in general." But this is two-sided: "In fairness, many Americans see Israeli politics in atavistic terms,
- Clinton Offered Ceasefire to Israel The Daily Beast's Ben Sarlin reads the speech as an attempt to calm tensions, but only if Netanyahu meets her halfway. "Clinton’s speech was warm but firm—America and Israel are clear allies, but the
Obama administration will not back down from its commitment to restarting the
peace process. It’s up to Netanyahu in his speech Monday night and Tuesday in
his meeting with Obama, to decide whether to walk back the current tensions with
a symbolic or substantive gesture on the settlement front, or if the issue is
worth extending the current spat further."
- Could U.S. Politics Topple Alliance? In an NPR chat, the Washington Insitute's Robert Satloff said, "I think the idea that the Israelis somehow have to meet an American test to show
their commitment to peace is quite odd and strange in credulity." New America Foundation's Steve Clemons retorted, "The whole notion that there's no space or no light between the U.S. and Israeli
positions is a ridiculous formulation because we're both sovereign governments
with interests that often converge and some interests that diverge, and we're
going to have to occasionally wrestle over those."
Want to add to this story? Let us know in comments
or send an email to the author at
mfisher at theatlantic dot com.
You can share ideas for stories on the Open Wire.