Independent Senator Joe Lieberman really, really likes
"no." Lieberman's penchant for opposition made him a controversial figure
the health care debate--but it also made him a key player in the talks
ultimately securing a version of reform to Lieberman's liking. Now, with
some Republicans hinting they
might not vote to ratify
Obama's strategic arms reduction treaty
(START) with Russia, Lieberman is hinting that he's not happy with the
treaty himself. Is he really going to try to block it? Could he succeed?
Not Enough Votes Without Me The Hill's Bridget Johnson reports,
"Lieberman (I-Conn.) said the administration may have problems getting
the START treaty signed last week ratified in the Senate. Lieberman said
he'd arrived at his belief on the vote tally falling short after
conversations with colleagues over the congressional recess."
Why I'm Opposed Speaking on Fox New Sunday:
"Anytime we are working on something with our old Cold War enemy,
Russia, cooperatively, it's a good sign. Anything we can do to reduce
the number of nuclear warheads in the world is a positive development.
But in my opinion as we reduce the number of nuclear warheads... we have
to make darn sure that are nuclear warheads are capable and modern and a
lot of them are decades old. So I feel very strongly that I am going to
be real hesitant to vote for this treaty unless we have a commitment
from the Administration that they are prepared to modernize our nuclear
- Obama Already Doing This The Washington
Monthly's Steve Benen sighs, "Of course,
if Lieberman and Republicans are principally concerned with modernizing
the existing U.S. nuclear arsenal, they're preaching to the choir, since
the Obama administration has already endorsed doing exactly that."
He Really Wants Think Progress' Max Bergmann fumes, "what Lieberman is
really saying is that he agrees with those on the far right that want to
needlessly build new nuclear weapons, nearly two decades years after
the end of the Cold War. The far right insists that the U.S. is falling
behind because it is not building new nuclear weapons and that our
existing nuclear arsenal is deteriorating. This is a myth and
demonstrates a complete, if not willful, ignorance of our approach to
maintaining our nuclear weapons."
- Could Be a 'Tough Battle'
The Huffington Post's Sam Stein predicts, "Lieberman's comments foreshadow what
seems likely to be a piqued and
difficult battle for the White House on the nuclear arms control front."
Obama "needs to cobble together at least eight Republicans (nine, if
crosses party lines) to get START II into law."
- Good For Joe
Commentary's Jennifer Rubin mocks the
Obama administration. "Did they think that in an election year they'd
get this ratified -- or that with reduced Democratic numbers in the
Senate it would get through next year? Perhaps all Obama wanted was a
signing ceremony, something to justify his 'reset' policy and his
previous betrayal of Eastern European allies. It is hard to imagine that
the Russians will be pleased and our relationship enhanced once we
break the news to them that their shiny new treaty is dead on arrival"
Want to add to this story? Let us know in comments
or send an email to the author at
mfisher at theatlantic dot com.
You can share ideas for stories on the Open Wire.