Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has finally weighed in
publicly on the South Korean warship matter, a day after South Korea
formally accused North Korea of sinking the Cheonan back in March.
"This will not be and cannot be business as usual. There must be an
international--not just a regional--response," said Clinton, reported
by John Pomfret
for The Washington Post. So what now? Commentators were already fretting
over the predicament before Clinton spoke: what could an "international" response look like?
- No Good Answer Here--Don't Expect Military, suggests Doug Mataconis at Outside the Beltway, reacting to Clinton's condemnation.
this were any other nation, and any other part of the world, the
response to a torpedo attack on a warship would be military retaliation
of some kind. That's not going to happen on the Korean Peninsula and,
given both the irrationality of the Pongyang regime, and the danger of
a wider war, it probably shouldn't. However, we already know that words
and sanctions don’t have much of an impact on Kim Jong Il so it's
unclear what good they'd do this time around.
- The Key Is
China "North Korea is an excellent example of the hopelessness of a
ferocious dictatorship over five decades, threatening South Korea and
the global community to a degree that is out of proportion to the
poverty-stricken country's actual capabilities," explains Seoul-based Lee Byong-Chul
at Asia Sentinel. But Beijing has "warned" Seoul about responding too
strongly to the Cheonan incident, "and insinuated that China would form
a likely alliance with North Korea" should the situation escalate.
"Pyonynag views Chinese engagement as necessary to its survival," while
China has its own interests in maintaining influence in North Korea.
All Eyes on Beijing The Chinese government has previously "advocated a
softly-softly" approach to North Korea, hoping it "could be persuaded
to follow China's own transition from cultish despotism to economic
reform," writes Con Coughlin
at The Telegraph. But "if China has serious pretensions to becoming a
major world power, then it needs to bring all its influence to bear on
the North Korean regime to ensure that there is no recurrence of the
- 'Wise to Expect the Unexpected' says Donald Kirk
at Asia Times, particularly in this "standoff." Nevertheless, "the
sense ... is the North has made a fundamental point. There's not much
South Korea will do beside engage in threats and words while China
makes up for the losses in trade, aid and diplomatic sympathy." Kirk
also has an unusual idea regarding North Korea's declaration, denying
that it sank the ship, that "it wanted to send a delegation of its own
... to carry out its own investigation" of the Cheonan wreckage:
if South Korea actually said, fine, come on down? Is North Korea really
prepared to send a team? And what would they say or think when
photographed peering at the fragments of the torpedo--and the wreckage
of the Cheonan? Any chance they would return to the North bearing the news for Kim Jong-il that, yes, we actually did fire the torpedo?
- 'War Is Not Likely,' asserts John McCreary, a former intelligence analyst, "but increased tension and testiness are." He notes that "the
quality of the South's demonstrative evidence is such to even make it
hard for China and Russia to stand behind North Korea in this incident."
Want to add to this story? Let us know in comments
or send an email to the author at
hhorn at theatlantic dot com.
You can share ideas for stories on the Open Wire.