As the stalled American economy meekly sputters
back to life and analysts anticipate Europe's descent
into economic chaos
proclamations of an end of an era have been multiplying. Those who had predicted
China's rise to become the superpower of this century may be tempted to say this moment is arriving sooner than expected.
Not so fast, says Harvard international relations professor Joseph Nye
"China's current reputation for power benefits from projections about
the future," and not all of those projections may prove accurate. The
Chinese "export-led development model will probably need to be adjusted
as global trade and financial balances become more contentious in the
aftermath of the financial crisis." Meanwhile, "China has not yet found
a way to solve the problem of demands for political participation (if
not democracy) that tend to accompany rising per capita income." The
country will need to find its way to a political system that can deal
with the "expanding urban middle class, regional inequality and
resentment among ethnic minorities"--that's hard to do, and it's not
clear yet whether China will make the transition. Finally, it's not
clear China will have the military presence the U.S. did on its way to
the top in the 20th century.
Nye's conclusion? "China's century is not yet upon us." But that's not a cause for celebration: "Bill Clinton was basically right when he told Jiang Zemin in 1995 that
the US has more to fear from a weak China than a strong China." Both countries "have much to gain from working together."
Want to add to this story? Let us know in comments
or send an email to the author at
hhorn at theatlantic dot com.
You can share ideas for stories on the Open Wire.