The Pentagon and the media are bracing for a WikiLeaks release of
400,000 documents pertaining to Iraq. It hasn't happened
yet and, despite expectation it would come this month, it might actually not.
Here's what we know about the long-anticipated WikiLeaks Iraq dump,
what's being done about it, what WikiLeaks says, and what it all means.
- Unclear When Docs Will Be Released Reuters' Phil Stewart reports,
"Pentagon spokesman Col. Dave Lapan told Reuters the timing of the leak
remained unclear but the Defense Department was ready for a document
dump as early as Monday or Tuesday, a possibility raised in previous
WikiLeaks statements. Still, people familiar with the upcoming leak told
Reuters they do not expect WikiLeaks to release the classified files
for at least another week." ReadWriteWeb's Mike Melanson points out
that there have been a flurry of stories claiming that today was the
planned release date, but that could be a mistake that began with a
now-corrected post at Wired.
- Pentagon Preparing for Massive Leak The BBC reports,
"The US military has assembled a 120-member team to prepare for the
expected publication of some 400,000 Iraq war documents on the Wikileaks
website. The documents are thought to concern battle activity, Iraqi
security forces and civilian casualties. The Pentagon said it wants the
documents back to avoid potentially damaging information being released.
... Pentagon spokesman Col Dave Lapan said the team was reviewing the
files on the Iraq war to discover what the possible impact of the
Wikileaks release could be."
- Could Dredge Up Iraq War's Ugliest Aspects Reuters' Phil Stewart writes,
"Although the Iraq conflict has faded from public debate in the United
States in recent years, the document dump threatens to revive memories
of some of the most trying times in the war, including the Abu Ghraib
prisoner abuse scandal. It could also renew debate about foreign and
domestic actors influencing Iraq, which has been wrestling with a
political vacuum since an inconclusive election in March. One source
familiar with the Iraq documents said they are likely to contain
revelations about civilian casualties, but expected them to cause less
of a stir than the Afghan leak."
- Why Is Wikileaks Delaying Release? Wired's Spencer Ackerman muses,
"We’re still waiting for WikiLeaks to reveal hundreds of thousands of
U.S. military documents on the Iraq war. Much as we’re hitting refresh
in anticipation of the Iraq release, WikiLeaks’ website is still down. ('Undergoing scheduled maintenance,' it explains.) Threat Level reported last month
that at least six WikiLeaks staffers have recently resigned, upset by
the rapidity with which founder Julian Assange wants the Iraq documents
released or the pre-release screenings provided to select media outlets.
Some of those staffers considered an October 18 release deadline —
today — inadequate for withholding the names of Iraqis who aided U.S.
troops, a priority for the group after it saw widespread criticism for
releasing the names of Afghans who did the same thing."
Julian Assange: Stories About Iraq Docs Are 'Fabrication' WikiLeaks chief Assange posted an open letter to Twitlonger,
a web tool that allows Twitter users to post messages longer than the
usual 140 characters. "Where do all these claims about WikiLeaks doing
something on Iraq today (Monday) come from? A single tabloid blog at
Wired Magazine! That's right. Over 700 articles, newspapers all over the
world, and newswires fooled by a tabloid blog--and each other." Assange
says that Wired is irresponsible and has an agenda to damage WikiLeaks.
The stories saying WikiLeaks planned a release for today are "another
fabrication. WikiLeaks does not speak about upcoming releases dates,
very rare exceptions we do not communicate any specific information
about upcoming releases, since that simply provides fodder for abusive
organizations to get their spin machines ready."
- Assange Shows He Doesn't Understand the Media Mother Jones's Adam Weinstein writes,
"Now, I'll try not to quibble too much with Assange's fundamental
misunderstanding of media terms (a tabloid is a style of printed
newspaper, man, not a blog). And I'll just ignore for now the irony of a
guy who advocates information democracy totally trashing a viral story,
and denouncing Wired's Threat Level and Danger Room
blogs as 'mainstream media.' (OK, they are owned by Conde Nast. But
Seymour Hersh, that guy who uncovered that My Lai thingy and the Abu
Ghraib dealy, writes for the Conde-owned The New Yorker, and I wouldn't quite call him mainstream.)"
Want to add to this story? Let us know in comments
or send an email to the author at
mfisher at theatlantic dot com.
You can share ideas for stories on the Open Wire.