Annie Leibovitz is not only considered one of the greatest photographers of her time--who could forget the images of a naked and pregnant Demi Moore?--but a huge commercial success as well, earning about $2 million a year. And now she is in danger of defaulting on a $24 million dollar loan, and on the brink of financial ruin. Yesterday, Bloomberg reported
that she may even be forced to hand over the creative rights to much of her life's work to settle her debts. A story in this month's New York Magazine tried to make sense of the photographer's crisis. Across the blogosphere, commentators wondered: How could this happen to Annie Leibovitz?
- Rich Does Not Equal Financial Genius, writes finance blogger Felix Salmon. He argues that Leibovtiz's imperfect credit history means she never should have been given such a large loan to begin with. "It’s far too easy for people to simply assume, on the grounds of wealth alone, that therefore there must also be some degree of financial sophistication." Matt Yglesias agrees, writing, "We tend to treat successful businessmen as if they were omniscient
central planners who'd gotten rich through their powers of
clairvoyance." No, he said, " the whole point of having businessmen instead of
central planners is that nobody's that omniscient--we let some flowers
bloom and some chips fall and life moves on." But Joe Weisenthal says that's crazy talk. "It's not financial intelligence that you need in order to know that taking a $24 million loan with your life's work as collateral is a huge, huge financial decision. That's just normal intelligence."
- We Are All Annie Leibovitz, writes Robert Frank at The Wall Street Journal. "Let's be honest. Annie Leibovitz succumbed to the same
leverage-and-live-large lifestyle as the rest of rich and famous over
the past 10 years. No matter how much money they were earning, it was
never enough to support the hunger for yet another house or car or
- A Long Time Coming, says Andrew Goldman in New York Magazine. His profile reveals a woman willing to go to great lengths--financially speaking--to produce the perfect print. "Her bloated work expenses were a chronic concern," Goldman writes. "Anthony Accardi,
Leibovitz's onetime printer, recalls that jobs were often rushed, like
the time he had to show up to a lab at 3 a.m. to pick up film of Bill
Clinton and have work prints ready by 7 a.m., a job so hurried that he
billed Condé Nast three times his regular rate. Accardi was stunned by
the number of work prints Leibovitz would order, and apparently so was
- Her Talent Will Prevail, said Tina Brown, who as the editor of Vanity Fair has actually worked with Leibovitz. Brown told NPR this week that Leibovitz's "extraordinary perfectionism" probably contributed to the artist's financial problems, but said the trait is part of her genius as well. "She really will do anything it takes, whether it means flying people around the country or going into overtime, or just bringing people to the set, or redoing the set, or redoing the whole thing three times, she just doesn’t really care as long as she gets her picture.” Brown admitted things had gotten out of hand, but sounded mostly lighthearted about the artist's future, and said Leibovitz will be fine because of her incredible talent. "“I don’t fear for Annie in the long run," she said.
In the art world, there are other questions.
- Is a Firm Preying on Artists? Just who, some ask, is Art Capital Group, the investment company that lent Leibovitz $24 million and may now own much of her life's work? A July story in PDN, a professional photography blog, suggested Art Capital Group may practice predatory practices with artists. "We all know Annie, but Art Capital Group? Who are they?"
- Other Bad Deals The art blog Art Observed said Leibovitz isn't the first artist embroiled in a lawsuit with the investment firm. "Whether it is due to the tender nature of the business that steps into
the fields of intellectual property when dealing directly with artists,
or the necessity on the company's side for firm and assertive approach
in an economic environment that is nothing short of unstable; Art
Capital Group seems to often be caught up in lawsuits with its clients."
- 'Pawnshop' In a February profile, The New York Times referred to Art Capital Group as a pawnshop, which owns the rights to numerous famous works of art. "This little-known corner of the art business is lightly regulated and
highly litigious. But this has not dissuaded clients who have included
rich collectors like Veronica Hearst, art galleries and prominent
artists themselves, including Ms. Leibovitz and Julian Schnabel."
Want to add to this story? Let us know in comments
or send an email to the author at
mgay at theatlantic dot com.
You can share ideas for stories on the Open Wire.