- Hilarious, writes Lilly Folwer at True/Slant: "I particularly like the slogan on the t-shirts he's selling: You said 'Til death do us part.' You're not dead yet."
- Plays an Important Role, writes Emma Sandoe: "While likely to be deemed unconstitutional and impractical, the amendment will point out to California and the nation that there is no validity to the argument for 'preserving traditional marriage.'
- Will Further Divide California, writes a blogger at Right Juris: "The movement for a California divorce ban has re-opened the wounds and division created by the Proposition 8 amendment that the people of California voted on last year."
- Don't Ban, Tinker, writes Paul Thornton at The Los Angeles Times: "As for ending marriages, I'd be open to some tinkering with the 'till death do us part' system that results in too many expensive, drawn-out divorce battles." Half serious, Thornton suggests that "marriage contracts ought to be more like driver's licenses: Every few years, couples would have to renew them." He finds the idea intriguing, though not necessarily "practical."
- Not a Preposterous Idea, writes Pat Krukenkamp-Maskell at The Examiner, weighing in on the conservative side: "If the community respected the sanctity of marriage, there would be no need for divorce. If men or women who left their families did not have legal recourse, perhaps they would be more of a mind to work out their marital difficulties.The solution to marital discord does not rest in banning divorce, but in preparing for marriage."
Want to add to this story? Let us know in comments
or send an email to the author at
jhudson at theatlantic dot com.
You can share ideas for stories on the Open Wire.
John Hudson



User Comments
Please type your comment and click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be prompted to log in or register