CEOs may be masters of the business world, but does their professional
success breed an overconfidence that should be cause for concern?
Litigator-turned-blogger Stephen Adshead
Guest-blogging for Anthony Painter's blog, Adshead comments on a bizarre
end to a recent case in the British courts.
In the course of the case, Joe Galloway, former Managing Director of a British company, had stated that he received an MBA degree from Concordia College, St. Johns when "he had in fact purchased in MBA online." Galloway was eventually tripped up, Adshead writes, when he "sized up" the opposing barrister for Sky and decided to describe memories of Concordia. He described the classrooms and his schoolmates. Then the opposing barrister blew it apart:
The schadenfreude for Sky’s legal team...reached climax several days later, when Sky’s
barrister presented to the Court an MBA that Lulu, his dog, had been
awarded from the same college; Lulu managing to get a better mark than
Galloway. The money-shot was when Sky’s barrister presented a letter of
recommendation to Lulu from the President and Vice-Chancellor of
Adshead asserts that while the legal implications of
the case are important, the psychological dimensions of the trial--"namely
Galloway’s overconfidence ... when betting that Sky’s barrister had not done his due diligence on the
MBA"--have larger lessons. Can this sort of overconfidence, which can lead powerful people to rash decisions, be unlearned? Adshead argues that it can, taking a lesson from London's infamous taxis.
"At The Knowledge College - I jest not – drivers study the shortest
route between all roads within a six mile radius of Charing Cross, in
the process enlarging their hippocampus (an area of the brain associated
with memory)," writes Adshead. "But in a unique way, drivers –
frequently young males from East London and full of swagger – are also
taught conflict management, in particular the benefit of humility."
Such a test could teach CEOs like Galloway a lesson, Adshead suggests:
– had he passed the Knowledge – would have answered Sky’s barrister
humbly and as follows: ‘I am sorry if my statement misled the Court. I
purchased the MBA.’ No more, no less. He might have felt insecure before
the more educated barrister, and momentarily foolish, but the rest of
his evidence would not have been tainted, and EDS might not be facing
Want to add to this story? Let us know in comments
or send an email to the author at
jkeller at theatlantic dot com.
You can share ideas for stories on the Open Wire.