The basic story line is this: The "greatest generation" answered the
call and proved their patriotism by winning World War II and thereby
saving the world from the Nazis. Then came the boomers, who evaded the
draft and spat at soldiers and generally have been a huge
disappointment. Richard Blumenthal, the Connecticut attorney general
and senate candidate who "misspoke" about having served in Vietnam has
given us a new reason to chew all this over.
problems with this narrative. For example, the World War II generation
are also the people who paid almost nothing into Social Security and
Medicare, but enjoy generous benefits that are politically impossible
to cut. The boomers, who are just starting to retire (someone born in
1945 turns 65 this year), have been paying in much more for their
entire working lives, and will never see anything like the deals their
parents have enjoyed. Meanwhile, the debt run up, mostly by writing
checks to the Greatest Generation, may wreck the country they saved in
their youth. Nothing so great about that.
As for evading the
draft, two facts complicate the narrative. One is that World War II
required mobilization of the whole country and needed every able-bodied
male to be in uniform. The Vietnam war, by contrast, never required
more than a small fraction of the available manpower. In the end, only
one out of ten Vietnam-era draft-age American males (or one out of 20
boomers if you include women) actually went to Vietnam. The rest
avoided service one way or another.
Second, World War II was the
''good war." Vietnam was a mistake or worse. By the end of the 1960s,
this was the view of most Americans, not just a few troublemakers. It's
often noted that North Vietnam defeated the United States in the short
run but the US won in the longer run. Look at Vietnam today. Meanwhile,
another reversal seems to have happened to the argument in America
about the Vietnam war. The war ended when it lost the support of most
Americans. Today, ambitious politicians imagine that they fought there.
If they're going to make up anything, they should be making up stories
about how active they were in the anti-war movement.
should feel guilty or ashamed about not having served in Vietnam. Dick
Blumenthal apparently feels otherwise. His lies about his own service,
or lack thereof, clearly come from something other than rational
calculation, since he has been inconsistent about it. This is not to
excuse him, of course.
In Wednesday's New York Times, Matt Bai
noted that nobody under 50 has ever had a draft card, his point being
that these old arguments are boring to a majority of the population.
Want to add to this story? Let us know in comments
or send an email to the author at
mkinsley at theatlantic dot com.
You can share ideas for stories on the Open Wire.