For all the diversity of their philosophical inclinations, most prominent atheists seem to be middle-aged or older white men. Think about it: Hitchens, Dawkins, Harris, Myers,
Randi. (Big exception:
Ayaan Hirsi Ali.) These renowned skeptics have led the charge in
challenging religious authorities, but they
haven't been nearly as successful in welcoming different ethnicities to
their own club, argues
Alom Shaha in the Guardian.
This oversight, which Shaha calls an "accidental exclusion,"
is a matter that should be of some concern to atheists of all stripes.
In the column, he explains that
minorities are more likely to face "greater pressure to adhere to the
religion of the communities in which they live." As an Asian atheist,
Shaha recounts his own conversations with others who felt that they must
carry on the "pretense" of their religion because "coming out" would be
an excruciating process.
Delicately pointing out that he doesn't
want to appear as if he has a "chip on his shoulder," the columnist
nevertheless insists that there needs to be greater effort made among
the atheist community to welcome minorities who, perhaps, feel isolated
in such gatherings. Simply "saying 'there isn't a big conspiracy to keep
black and Asian people out', is tragically missing the point," he
writes.
The scattered communities of atheists, as of now, do not
appear to fully recognize this as a problem. "Even if there's no
deliberate exclusion, there is accidental exclusion. Perhaps some people
are genuinely unaware of this, but perhaps others are just hoping the
problem does not really exist," concludes Shaha.
Want to add to this story? Let us know in comments
or send an email to the author at
ehayden at nationaljournal dot com.
You can share ideas for stories on the Open Wire.
User Comments
Please type your comment and click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be prompted to log in or register