A Fundraiser's Timing Puts Scrutiny on Obama's Gay Marriage Stance
When President Obama said his opposition to same-sex marriage was "evolving," some (like the New York Times editorial board) took it as a cop-out, but not syndicated sex columnist and It Gets Better project founder Dan Savage, who defended the president's record on gay rights at the White House's Pride Month reception last night.
"I believe the president should evolve," Savage (pictured above right, with his husband) told pool reporter Julie Mason. "He says he's evolving, I believe him.I want to hurry him along." At the same time, he reminded gay marriage supporters that it was acceptable--necessary even--to "scream and yell and be dicks and wear buttons," a point Savage seemed to hammer home with his own button that said, "evolve already."
It's been a busy week of gadfly playing for Savage. In Mark Oppenheimer's upcoming New York Times Magazine piece on infidelity, Savage makes the case for a kind of sensibility in relationships that Oppenheimer deems "American Gay Male, after that community's tolerance for pornography, fetishes and a variety of partnered arrangements, from strict monogamy to wide openness." What it boils down to is an arrangement where neither party--whether in a heterosexual or homosexual long-term relationship--has "the monogamous expectation" (Savage's words) of their partner. "Treating monogamy, rather than honesty or joy or humor, as the main indicator of a successful marriage gives people unrealistic expectations of themselves and their partners." Another key quote as Oppenheimer explains Savage's views:
In the feminist revolution, rather than extending to women "the same latitude and license and pressure-release valve that men had always enjoyed," we extended to men the confines women had always endured. "And it's been a disaster for marriage."
Even if this notion seems horribly cynical, it's tough not to be impressed by Savage's logic. "If you are expected to be monogamous and have one person be all things sexually for you, then you have to be whores for each other," he tells Oppenheimer. "You have to be up for anything." The subject of monogamy and its less strict variations is delved into in detail, and Savage is clear that the most important thing here is honest communication.
Want to add to this story? Let us know in comments
or send an email to the author at
rgustini at theatlantic dot com.
You can share ideas for stories on the Open Wire.
Ray Gustini
| Related Articles | More by Ray Gustini | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Have a story we missed? A link we have to click? A sharp opinion about the news? Instead of waiting for us to post it, tell us on the Open Wire.
Submit your news and ideas | See all reader posts
User Comments
Please type your comment and click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be prompted to log in or register