U.S. Rules Climate Change Won't Be a Threat to the Keystone Pipeline — and Vice Versa
Setting aside a contentious political issue until after the 2012 election, the Obama Administration is postponing a decision on whether to allow an oil pipeline to run from Canada to the Gulf Coast. The Keystone XL pipeline would carry oil from the tar sands of Alberta, and it's become a hot button issue on both the left and right. Environmentalists have warned of its potential to aggravate climate change while conservatives have suggested it will help create jobs in the energy sector. Thus The Wall Street Journal's Deborah Soloman calls today's decision "a temporary win for environmental groups," and one that is "likely to anger the oil and gas industry." (For a nice summary of the issues surrounding the pipeline, see Jordan Weissmann's analysis over at The Atlantic.) Specifically, the State Department will announce its intention to reroute the pipeline away from Nebraska, the Journal reports. It's proximity to a water source there has made resistance in that state particularly strong. But a new route will require more study of its environmental impact, which Solomon says will likely take until at least 2013. That's sure to at least temporarily please the protesters who surrounded the White House this weekend to protest the pipeline.
Want to add to this story? Let us know in comments or send an email to the author at erandall at theatlantic dot com. You can share ideas for stories on the Open Wire.
| Related Articles | More by Eric Randall | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Have a story we missed? A link we have to click? A sharp opinion about the news? Instead of waiting for us to post it, tell us on the Open Wire.
Submit your news and ideas | See all reader posts
User Comments
Please type your comment and click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be prompted to log in or register