The Catcher in the Rye
is surely the best-known work of J.D. Salinger, who
died last week at age 91. But Holden Caulfield, the book's main character, is not universally beloved.
Not everyone agrees that the
moody, mouthy protagonist deserves his reputation as a hero of
tortured adolescence. For every dozen admirers of Salinger's novel, there's a
critic or social analyst questioning Holden's place in the canon.
- Holden No Typical Teen Guardian's Theo Hobson takes issue with the usual characterization of Holden-as-Everyteen, arguing that Holden's particular neuroses are what gives Catcher its power. "The novel is not about teenage angst in general. At its heart is
this very specific experience of feeling spiritually threatened by the
power of sexual peer-pressure, this fear that sexual maturity entails a
sacrifice of one's moral integrity."
- Holden's Middle Path Doesn't Exist Anymore At a New York Times literary roundtable, Elizabeth Wurtzel wonders whether Catcher is
relevant to a generation of overachievers and burnouts. "The world now
is so much more dangerous, the temptations so much darker
than anything Holden could have encountered, that kids are either
L7-square or they're just messed up. The chance to be a tiny bit wild
and crazy in the teenybopper tradition is not part of what we know."
- Schools Have Domesticated Catcher Educators have defanged Catcher by putting it on the required reading list, argues Mark Borigini
at Psychology Today. But he's not sure it was ever a masterwork of
subversion: "Holden Caulfield is a rich kid, who blew an opportunity at
a prep
school; he seems a bit phony, a lot spoiled... and those of us
who read [this novel] fall into the trap set by the phonies."
- One Kid Can't Speak for Millions At American Thinker, Selwyn Duke is skeptical about the way Salinger depicts precocity. "I didn't experience teen 'angst,' and I didn't think everyone was a phony, either... In fact, I think the young are better epitomized by a starry-eyed idealism, where they expect some virtue, heroism, and idealism in others. For sure, the millions of youths who chanted 'yes, we can!' in 2008 expected those things."
