- Your Vote Will Be Remembered In the Washington Times, Janet Murguia, the president of the National Council of La Raza, said Sotomayor's confirmation "is a big moment for the Latino community. We are united on this, and we are paying attention." Murguia said the GOP is wrong if it thinks there's no downside to casting a vote against her. "I have to say, if that's your contribution to this historic moment, frankly, we expected more. Much more."
- Democrats Were Worse The Wall Street Journal says it "can’t help but contrast her treatment with the way Democrats smeared and filibustered appellate-court nominee Miguel Estrada in 2001," when a Bush nomination was smothered to death by Democrats. Standing firm regarding one of the debate's most prominent points, The Journal once again bemoaned Sotomayor's "behavior" in the Ricci v. deStefano case.
- Predicting Republican Vindication Kathryn Jean-Lopez of the National Review said talk that Senate Republicans will be punished by Hispanics for voting "no" on Sotomayor is ridiculous: "Democratic demagogues are vilely contending that opposition to Sotomayor is anti-Hispanic. We have much higher regard for the intelligence of Hispanic voters than those demagogues evidently do."
- The Worst of Racial Politics In The Washington Times, Ilya Shapiro said the confirmation of Sotomayor was proof that the American dream endures, despite the fact that "she would not have been considered had she not been a Hispanic woman." He said the seat should be Miguel Estrada's.
Want to add to this story? Let us know in comments or send an email to the author at mgay at theatlantic dot com. You can share ideas for stories on the Open Wire.



User Comments
Please type your comment and click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be prompted to log in or register