Was the demonstration against President
Obama in Washington over the weekend anything more than the partisan fringe fest? Absolutely, say conservative pundits in applauding the success of the event. Here are their main points in the wake of the protest.
- Universal, Not Partisan Matt Welch wrote
in the New York Post that the protesters weren't just there because
Obama is a Democrat. "Sure, it's fair to wonder where these protesters
were when Bush was
expanding government at levels not seen since Lyndon Johnson," he
wrote. "But the
people I talked to had almost no kind words to say about W., and many
explicitly warned that any Republican hoping to benefit from this
backlash will have to re-embrace the fiscal discipline that the GOP
abandoned en masse over the previous decade.
- Legitimate, Not Astroturf National Review's Mark Hemingway asked,
"Can we drive a stake through the astroturf claim now?" He recalled
speaking to protesters from 16 states and cited a South Carolina man
who came to Washington, along with 160 of his neighbors, on a
privately-chartered convoy of three buses. He called the protest
"friendly and civil," "undeniably sober and informed," and "filled with
immigrants." National Review colleague Jay Nordlinger noted that most signs were homemade.
- Sincere, Not Fringe Reason's Matt Welch suggested that there were few, if any, fringe elements at the protest. "The End-the-Fed, read-The-Fountainhead quotients were extremely marginal," he wrote. "All but one did not care about Obama's birth certificate controversy,
and those I asked thought it was foolish to bring guns to political
gatherings." Nation Review's Hemingway wrote, " I saw two, count 'em, birther signs in hours of wandering around."
- Any Fringe Wasn't GOP
Jon Henke conceded that some wingnuts were present, but argued they
weren't Republicans, but rather supporters of fringe Democrat Lyndon LaRouche. "There were a LOT of LaRouchies and Larouchies are not Republicans," he wrote. "Did you see all the Obama/Hitler signs?" he asked. "Those were by LaRouchies. I saw dozens and dozens."
- Liberals Will Spin Reason's Matt Welch warned
that liberal pundits write "caricatures" of the protesters, citing Alex
Pareene's description of them as "al Qaeda in America" as phony.
"Political rallies are no place to seek the subtle truth, nor feel
particularly glowing about your countrymen, and today was no different
in that regard for me," he wrote. "But the meta-fact about a huge
protest eight months into his term is certainly significant, and very
little of what I saw made me fear that Alex Pareene will be blown to
smithereens by a suicide hijacker from Arkansas. I am confident,
however, that I will soon be made to fear what I utterly failed to
- Nothing Wrong with Confederate Flags James Joyner defended the number of Confederate flags at the rally. "Now, as a Southerner, I tend to have a more benign view of people
waving Confederate flags or wearing pro-gun T-shirts," he wrote. "Some of them are
racist yahoos, to be sure, but most of them are just decent folks
taking pride in a way of life they feel is under assault."
Want to add to this story? Let us know in comments
or send an email to the author at
mfisher at theatlantic dot com.
You can share ideas for stories on the Open Wire.