It's been rough going for the "public option" this afternoon
. But Jonathan Cohn, The New Republic's resident health care wonk, finds cause for optimism even in the event--dreaded by most liberals--that a government-run
health insurance plan doesn't become a part of the final health-reform package. Cohn argues
that liberals can accept, and even embrace, a model
health-care reform that does not include a public option. They should look to the Netherlands, which in 2006 instituted a "successful universal
health care program based entirely on private
Under the new system, the Dutch government has required that everybody
gets insurance; in return, it makes sure insurance is available to
everybody, regardless of pre-existing medical conditions or income.
Although the government finances long-term care through a public
program, it has turned over the job of providing basic medical coverage
exclusively to private insurers, including some for-profit
Still, there’s a catch. A big catch. Private insurance in the
Netherlands works because it operates more or less like a public
utility. The Dutch government regulates industry practices
tightly--more tightly than the reforms now moving through Congress
propose to do in the United States.
Cohn concludes, "If Congress ends up gutting the public plan, in part
or in whole, then
it needs to work even harder on making private insurance work." We're
not there yet, but he approvingly cites a proposal in Congress to
mandate "a 'coverage label'
modeled on the nutrition label that all food products must include" as
one example of how we might go Dutch after all.
Want to add to this story? Let us know in comments
or send an email to the author at
mfisher at theatlantic dot com.
You can share ideas for stories on the Open Wire.