In the House of Representatives, each state is accorded one seat. But some states are far more populous than others. In The New York Times, Peter Baker
examines a new lawsuit that claims says some citizens are disenfranchised by the current size of the House. A vote in Utah, Baker explains, "counts about two-thirds as much as it would in Iowa."
523,000 in Wyoming get the same voting power, as do the 527,000 in
one of Rhode Island's two districts and the 531,000 in the other. That 400,000-person disparity between top and bottom has generated a
federal court challenge that is set to be filed Thursday in
Mississippi, charging that the system effectively disenfranchises
people in certain states. The lawsuit asks the courts to order the House to fix the problem by increasing its size from 435
seats to at least 932, or perhaps as many as 1,761. That way, the
plaintiffs argue, every state can have districts that are close to
Should the House be expanded?
Want to add to this story? Let us know in comments
or send an email to the author at
mgay at theatlantic dot com.
You can share ideas for stories on the Open Wire.