There is a lot to dislike
in Max Baucus's version of health care reform, released yesterday
. But there's good news, too. Here, experts and columnists provide the five high points of BaucusCare, which are largely financial.
- Short-Term, Budget-Neutral The New Republic's Jonathan Cohn praised its budget neutrality. "One virtue of the Baucus bill--perhaps its chief virtue--is that it won't
create red ink," he wrote. "On the contrary, projections suggest the combination of
savings and revenues will pay for every dime of the program, as
President Obama likes to put it, and actually start to generate small
surpluses by the time the ten-year window is over. It's also supposed
to save money after that period, actually curbing our medical
- Long-Term, Reduces Deficit Noam Scheiber, also of the New Republic, argued that the bill performs even better in the long term. "According to the CBO score
of the bill, Baucus produces about $50 billion in deficit
reduction over the next decade (see p. 2), then potentially large
savings after that," he wrote. "According to CBO's most recent forecast of GDP for the 2020 to 2029 period (see this document),
that half-percent of GDP would translate to over $1 trillion. And
that's before you really add in a lot of the so-called "game-changers"
the administration has been pushing--things like bundled payments to give hospitals incentives to care for patients upon release."
- The Invisible Excise Tax Matthew Yglesias lauded
an excise tax on high-value health care that will be "largely invisible
to everyone outside insurance companies and corporate HR departments."
Yglesias wrote that it will reduce costs by "encouraging people to
consume less health care" but, in terms of care and costs, "the vast
majority of people won't be impacted at all." For most consumers, it's
like magic! "I think this is a great idea—very clever," he wrote. "This
is good policy done in an impressive artful way."
- Allows Responsible Inter-State Competition Ezra Klein noted
that Baucus included the most frequent Republican request, allowing
consumers to buy insurance from different states, thus widely
increasing free market competition between insurance provider. The
problem, however, is this can encourage insurance providers to all just
move to the state with the least regulations, as happened with credit
card companies. But Baucus solves this by including provisions for
federal regulations on any company that wanted to sell insurance across
state lines, thus preventing the "all manner of chicanery" that credit
card companies get away with. Klein wrote, "This could prove seriously
transformative in the private insurance market."
- It's Not the Final Bill Mike Lux,
making perhaps the one pro-Baucus case that was most agreed upon,
reminded everyone that this is far from the the final word on how to
execute health care reform. "It's not even close to the final bill," he
wrote, outlining five keys reasons the bill could change dramatically.
"Traditional media will act like whatever is in the Senate Finance bill
will be the bill, that the deal is done. Not even close, folks."
Want to add to this story? Let us know in comments
or send an email to the author at
mfisher at theatlantic dot com.
You can share ideas for stories on the Open Wire.