In the 24 hours since Sen. Max Baucus released his version
of health care reform, experts and columnists have digested the 220
page document and are declaring the greatest strengths and most damning
weaknesses of BaucusCare. Below are what pundits have declared to be
the five worst parts, and later this morning we'll explore the five
Here are the five best elements
- Exchanges Too Limited Sen. Ron Wyden,
Democrat from Oregon, wants to see greater access to exchanges, which
would provide more options to consumers and thus drive down costs. "The
problem with these bills, however, is that they would not make the
exchanges available to all Americans," he wrote.
"Only very small companies and those individuals who can’t get
outside of the exchange — 25 million people — would be allowed to shop
there. This would leave more than 200 million Americans with no more
options, private or public, than they have today." Wyden proposed a
plan for expanded exchanges, which he said "would not be forced on them
by government mandate" and would promote "a system that works better
- Forces Discrimination Against Low-Income Workers Ezra Klein called the "free rider" provision a "no good, very bad, horrible policy." He said it "penalizes employers for hiring low-income workers who are eligible for subsidies.
will create an incentive to do one of two things: Don't hire
low-income workers (hire a teenager looking for a job rather than a
single mother, or hire a housewife looking for a second job rather than
an unemployed breadwinner), or hire illegal immigrants," he wrote. "No
matter how you look at it, the policy makes it profitable for
employers to discriminate against hiring low-income workers. It is not
only the worst policy idea in the bill, but one of the worst policy
ideas I've ever seen."
- "Worthless" Co-ops Marcy Wheeler lamented, "As designed, the co-ops would not be more attractive than the
private insurance options, nor would they bring down subsidies (which
means they wouldn't bring down costs to us, either).
As designed, the co-ops are totally worthless."
- Insufficient Subsidies for Working-Class Robert Greenstein
of the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities wrote that subsidies to
help people afford coverage are too low. "The plan falls short in the
subsidies it provides to help low- and
moderate-income people afford health coverage and out-of-pocket costs.
That could leave many people who are eligible for subsidies facing
fairly steep insurance premiums and cost-sharing charges they could
have difficulty affording."
- Bad for Young People Karl Rove cautioned
that fining young voters would be politically problematic. "The plan
put out by Sen. Max Baucus (D., Mont.) this week would
fine them up to $950 a year for not being insured. Young people are
9.9% of the population. Fining them only antagonizes them," he wrote.
"Mr. Obama's approval among young voters is down 10 points since July,
according to Gallup polls. It may drop more."
Want to add to this story? Let us know in comments
or send an email to the author at
mfisher at theatlantic dot com.
You can share ideas for stories on the Open Wire.