Good Question!

Why Won't the NRA Support Plaxico Burress?

Katharine Rust 345 Views Sep 23, 2009

Yesterday former New York Giants receiver (and superbowl star) Plaxico Burress was sentenced to two years in prison for attempted criminal possession of a weapon. Burress was indicted earlier this month for an incident that occurred last November, when he brought an unlicensed gun into a New York club and accidentally shot himself in the leg. Dumb move. But even gun-toting dummies can usually rely on support from Second Amendment activists. Democratic Underground wonders why they're not defending Plaxico.

Here's a Black man who carried a gun, (unlicensed and concealed) in NY City, shot himself, but the NRA didn't jump to his defence? Why not? This would have been a CLASSIC case of upholding the 2nd Amendment, wouldn't it? I mean, a high-profile sports star brings a gun for protection, shoots himself accidentally, and now get to do a couple of years for shooting himself and losing his job (a high-paying job at that).

Where is the justice NRA members????

Will the Michigan Militia respond?

Want to add to this story? Let us know in comments or send an email to the author at krust at theatlantic dot com. You can share ideas for stories on the Open Wire.

Sources

Topics:
Related Articles   More by Katharine Rust

Newtown, the Monday After: Progress Out of Sorrow?

NRA's Wayne LaPierre Doubles Down: There Aren't Enough Guns in Schools

NRA Member Makes Case Against Gun Control by Promising to Shoot People

 

5 Best Wednesday Columns

5 Best Tuesday Columns

Elsewhere on the Web

User Comments

Please type your comment and click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be prompted to log in or register

  • The Atlantic Wire on Twitter
  • The Atlantic Wire RSS Feed
  • The Atlantic Wire iPhone App