- Don't Hold Your Breath For Fireworks Rachel Sklar of Mediaite says "those looking for a knock-down drag-out fight should look back to Toronto for a sense of how this one will go — probably politely, chummily, and with a few key references to 'freedom.'” Sklar won't be watching. Unless, she says, the "Secretary of State is in the front row, heckling. I’d pay $1,250 to see that."
- Bored Old Men Wonkette says Clinton and Bush are no longer all that relevant. "Details are still fuzzy re: why anyone suggested this in the first place, what anyone believes the stakes to be or hopes to gain from this, or what’s in it for absolutely anyone—Clinton, Bush, the audience, Radio City Music Hall, or you, simply hearing in passing that this thing even exists."
- Unless There's a Brawl, We're Not Interested Rachel Slajda of Talking Points Memo says that the last time Clinton and Bush met, "they had a pleasant, friendly chat."
- Doesn't Seem Like a Fair Fight The Gothamist's John Del Signore says this may not end well for Bush. "Dimwitted former cheerleader and frat-boy boozer George W. Bush has agreed to face loquacious skirt-chaser and crafty triangulator Bill Clinton in a debate," he writes. Still though, "Clinton's too much of a centrist company man to bring the hammer down,
and the fun will probably come, as usual, from watching Bush
mis-articulate his deluded perspective on his 'legacy.' Still, to be
safe, Clinton ought to pat Bush down thoroughly before the debate to make sure he's not cheating again."
Want to add to this story? Let us know in comments or send an email to the author at mgay at theatlantic dot com. You can share ideas for stories on the Open Wire.



User Comments
Please type your comment and click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be prompted to log in or register