While privacy is often the major concern, Schneier argues that the "unofficial uses" of surveillance systems are perhaps the bigger risk:
Any surveillance and control system must itself be secured. An infrastructure conducive to surveillance and control invites surveillance and control, both by the people you expect and by the people you don't.Are surveillance systems more trouble than they're worth?
China's hackers subverted the access system Google put in place to comply with U.S. intercept orders. Why does anyone think criminals won't be able to use the same system to steal bank account and credit card information, use it to launch other attacks or turn it into a massive spam-sending network? Why does anyone think that only authorized law enforcement can mine collected Internet data or eavesdrop on phone and IM conversations?
Want to add to this story? Let us know in comments
or send an email to the author at
hhorn at theatlantic dot com.
You can share ideas for stories on the Open Wire.
Heather Horn


User Comments
Please type your comment and click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be prompted to log in or register