Good Question!

Does National Enquirer Deserve a Pulitzer?

John Hudson Jan 21, 2010
National Enquirer may have made John Edwards the most unpopular man in history but does that merit a Pulitzer Prize? The tabloid's executive editor, Barry Levine, says its dogged coverage of Edwards' affair and paternity denial make it a strong "contender."

While most guffawed at Levine's suggestion (the Enquirer revels in the sensational), the Washington Post's Howard Kurtz, a veteran of the industry, says "don't laugh." Without National Enquirer, today's revelation may have never come out. Kurtz gives the supermarket tabloid props:

Although the Enquirer stories may or may not be prize-winning material... there is no question that the paper scooped the rest of the media world.

When the Enquirer first reported in 2007 that Edwards had had an affair with Hunter, the former North Carolina senator dismissed the account as tabloid trash. The rest of the media, having no independent proof, steered clear of the story, even as Edwards, aided by his cancer-stricken wife Elizabeth, was mounting an aggressive campaign for the 2008 Democratic presidential nomination.

Want to add to this story? Let us know in comments or send an email to the author at jhudson at theatlantic dot com. You can share ideas for stories on the Open Wire.

Related Articles   More by John Hudson

Most Unpopular Man in History Adds to Unpopularity

Edwards Update: Elizabeth's Media Blitz Meets John's Nightlife

Readers: WaPo Too Nosy About Edwards

 

R.J. Cutler: What I Read

Gavin Newsom: What I Read

Elsewhere on the Web

User Comments

Please type your comment and click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be prompted to log in or register

  • The Atlantic Wire on Twitter
  • The Atlantic Wire RSS Feed
  • The Atlantic Wire iPhone App