But it turns out, as many liberal commentators have zealously reported, that Rush was inadvertently praising an already-reformed health care system, putting him squarely in their camp. Hawaii enacted reform in the 1970s that resembles, in some measures, the Senate and House bills now under consideration. Ben Armbruster of Think Progress was among the first to trumpet Rush's accidental endorsement, and now The New Republic's Anthony Wright adds a wonky note to the razzing, spelling out more Hawaiian reforms whose fruits Rush enjoyed. One of the less-technical points on the mandate:
Hawaii's experience refutes, with real-world evidence, the opposition arguments that employer mandates are "job killers." Recent studies of the employer mandate in Hawaii--and in San Francisco, the other place in the United States with a strong employer requirement to contribute to health care--show that there was no measurable impact on jobs.
Want to add to this story? Let us know in comments or send an email to the author at bcarlson at theatlantic dot com. You can share ideas for stories on the Open Wire.



User Comments
Please type your comment and click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be prompted to log in or register