The Center for American Progress provided the ammunition, and Paul Krugman
fired away. The administration-friendly think tank first coined the term "deficit peacocks"--politicians showily imitating budget hawks. The essay said deficit peacocks are identified by their adoption of flashy positions involving spending freezes. In his Friday column, Krugman makes the call:
One week later, in the State of the Union address, President Obama
proposed a temporary freeze in nondefense discretionary spending ... What’s going on here? The answer, presumably, is that Mr. Obama’s
advisers believed he could score some political points by doing the
Want to add to this story? Let us know in comments
or send an email to the author at
hhorn at theatlantic dot com.
You can share ideas for stories on the Open Wire.