Driven by crescendoing debate
over the failed Christmas Day bombing
and Obama's anti-terror tactics, The New York Times has thrown up a two-week early preview of its magazine cover story
--"Inside Obama's War on Terrorism." Here are the some of the takeaways as online heavyweights digest Peter Baker's piece:
- Obama Thinks Cairo Was That Important? The New Republic's Isaac Chotiner
is perturbed by the idea that President Obama considers his June speech
in Cairo one of the most important anti-terrorism steps of the past
year: "Really?" asks Chotiner. "This is called putting too much faith
in the power of your own words."
- Thanks A Lot, Conservatives Baker writes of
several former Bush officials who are "for the most part ...
comfortable with Obama's policies," but "worried they would draw the
ire of Cheney's circle" if they admitted this. Liberals such as Steve
Benen and Matthew Yglesias are irritated: "It's really staggering what
this says about the ethical caliber of the
people we're talking about," writes Yglesias. "These are the toughest issues out there.
Obama is, they think, doing the right thing. But some of them don't
want to say he's doing the right thing because that might make Dick
Cheney mad and they're timid, gutless careerists?" Benen is similarly displeased.
- Give Some Credit--'Atmospherics' Matter Kevin Drum
also latches onto the section describing Bush-Obama similarities on
terror. He thinks the notion rings true, and would like to see "a
little more in the way of concrete changes." Still, he thinks some of
the experts Baker quotes undervalue the "atmospheric" changes of the
new administration: "the
fight against terrorism is very largely one of moderating the
conditions that allow groups like al-Qaeda to recruit and function in
the first place. Technically, it might not matter whether we keep
terror suspects in Guantanamo or Illinois, but if closing Gitmo
deprives Osama bin Laden of a rallying point for his troops then it's
worth a thousand drone attacks in the hinterlands of Afghanistan."
- Does Obama Get It? National Review's Jim Geraghty
wonders how the president could, after the terrorist threat on
Inauguration Day Baker reports, continue "sending captured al-Qaeda
back to Yemen ... give KSM a trial in New York City," and ban "physical
force in interrogations."
Want to add to this story? Let us know in comments
or send an email to the author at
hhorn at theatlantic dot com.
You can share ideas for stories on the Open Wire.