- Human Sacrifice to Populist Rage ABC's Jake Tapper sighs, "Voter anger is of heightened concern to members of Congress given the surprise victory of Sen.-elect Scott Brown, R-Mass., who rode a tide of voter discontent and economic anxiety to an upset victory in a special election earlier this week." ABC's Rick Klein evaluates, "A full embrace of economic populism, with all that means for policy and politics, isn't happening any time soon. But a pivot like this -- even if it's driven by Congress, as opposed to the White House -- almost requires casualties."
- Liberals Push Back Against Obama AmericaBlog's John Aravosis cheers the "remarkable amount of spine suddenly arising from congressional liberals." Aravosis says voting out Bernanke would prove that "Democrats in Congress want to keep their jobs more than they want to keep the White House happy."
- It Should Come Down To Bank Limits Writing in the Daily Beast, economist Simon Johnson says the key issue should Bernanke's stance on Obama's bank limit proposals. "In almost every conceivable scenario for financial-sector reform, Bernanke would have the power either to make the regulation of scale and scope meaningless--"do a Greenspan"--or lead the way toward implementing sensible constraints on finance."
- About More Than Just Bernanke Reuters's James Pethokoukis writes that votes against Bernanke represent a backlash against the entire White House economic team. "Liberals in Congress want him gone. Then again, they want pretty much the whole Obama economic team gone. But Geithner and Summers aren't up for a Senate vote. Bernanke is. And if Dems start bailing, don't expect Republicans to save him. No politician in America gains anything by voting for Bernanke."
Want to add to this story? Let us know in comments or send an email to the author at mfisher at theatlantic dot com. You can share ideas for stories on the Open Wire.



User Comments
Please type your comment and click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be prompted to log in or register