Senator Evan Bayh's shocking retirement
has made the impossible seem
possible: Democrats could go from holding a 60-vote supermajority to losing the Senate majority completely. This
prospect still seems remote to many analysts, since it would require
Republicans to win every Democratic-held seat at play, while losing none of their own.
But still, what are the odds?
- Possible, but a Long Shot
Chris Cillizza at The Washington Post says the loss has "considerable"
implications on the national stage, and cites electoral guru Charlie
Cook's placement of 10 Democratic seats in his "most competitive
categories"--in other words, "if Republicans run the table and don't lose any of their own vulnerable seats they could take back the Senate."
Yet Cillizza isn't betting any money this will happen. "With so little
room for error, however, it's still a long shot for Republicans to take
over the upper chamber. To expand their chances, the GOP must continue
to expand the playing field, with Senate races in Wisconsin and
Washington State the most likely possibilities."
- Entirely Possible David Catanese
of Politico puts a bolder spin on it, saying the Dems' majority is now
"within striking distance." He outlines five ways this could happen.
Here are three of the possibilities: "The situation in Arkansas
continues to deteriorate ... Romanoff roughs up Bennet in Colorado
... Third time's a charm for Rossi in Washington."
- Bet Against It Nate Silver
of FiveThirtyEight runs the numbers, and places his bets against a
Republican rout of the Democrats. He says it's quite possible to see a
scenario in which the Republicans win. The trick, however, is that
Republicans can't lose any of their seats in the meantime. "This is the
factor that the market may not be properly accounting for. The
Democrats are competitive right now in Missouri, Ohio, New Hampshire,
and Kentucky, could become that way in North Carolina and possibly
Florida, and there's an outside chance they could get a wild card of
their own like Arizona. In most of these races, you either have a
Republican (in an anti-establishment year) who is more a part of the
establishment than his opponent, primary dynamics that could lead to
the selection of an inexperienced or too-conservative candidate, or
- Not Only Possible--Lieberman Could Tip the Scales Sean Trende
at RealClearPolitics writes that Bayh "upsets a year's worth of
comfortable predictions" that Republicans didn't have a chance to take
back the Senate. Now he says confidently that the Senate Bottom is
"likely to be in play come election day in November." Spelling out a
perfect GOP performance, he then sees how they could even get to 51
votes: "If the GOP does manage to get to 50 seats, then another
variable enters the picture: Joe Lieberman. Would Lieberman caucus with
the Republicans in order to deny the Democrats a Senate majority?"
Want to add to this story? Let us know in comments
or send an email to the author at
bcarlson at theatlantic dot com.
You can share ideas for stories on the Open Wire.