The Texas GOP gubernatorial primary is one of the first dramas in the
hotly anticipated 2010 bloodbath. With current Governor Rick Perry
facing the 2010 anti-incumbent fervor, challenger Senator Kay Bailey
Hutchison facing anti-Senate irritation, and both having to deal with
Tea Party candidate Debra Medina, the race heated up early. Now Perry is pulling ahead, while Medina falls back amid suspicions she's a 9/11 "truther
." Here's what else observers are excited about:
- Last-Minute Perry Pull-Ahead From Hutchison "Part of the reason Hutchison lags behind," speculates Politics Daily's Bruce Drake,
"is that 37 percent want to see the three-term lawmaker remain in the
Senate, compared to 24 percent who prefer her as governor. Thirty-one
percent think she should be out of office." The Washington Post's Chris Cillizza
has other ideas: Perry did a very good job painting the senator as part
of the Washington problem in an anti-Washington year, and Hutchison
played her hand poorly.
- Yet Still a Danger of a Runoff In
Texas, the primary winner has to get at least 50 percent of the vote or face a
runoff election with the second-place contender. A new poll showing
Perry at 50 percent is "not exactly the good news Perry wants to hear," notes
CQ's Bob Benenson. It is, on the other hand, precisely the news Democrats want to hear, as the Austin American-Statesman's Ken Herman
points out, suggesting Democrats support the Tea Party's Medina,
stealing votes from Perry and forcing the Republican candidates to
waste money on the runoff election.
- Hindsight's 20/20--Should Have Talked about Secession "It's worth wondering," muses MSNBC's Domenico Montanaro,
"whether the race might have been different had Hutchison immediately
resigned her Senate race--without equivocation--and attacked Perry's
secessionist talk from last year. What if she had said back then, 'You
can be president of the Republic of Texas; I want to be governor of
Texas.' It would have shown some toughness that her candidacy seemed to
- Medina (and Texas) Flat-Out Crazy In The San Diego Union-Tribune, Ruben Navarrette says Medina's wacky theories may have hurt her, but "anywhere
else," he says, the revelation that she believed the U.S. government to
have "knock[ed] down two skyscrapers and killed about 3,000 people"
would have finished her. The conclusion: "If you think a little
thing like entertaining the preposterous theory that the U.S.
government toppled the Twin Towers would end someone's candidacy for
governor, then you don't know Texas politics." Texans have a contrarian
bent, prone to support people the "media elites" hate.
Want to add to this story? Let us know in comments
or send an email to the author at
hhorn at theatlantic dot com.
You can share ideas for stories on the Open Wire.