After rave reviews
of President Obama's unscripted back-and-forth with House Republicans
last Friday, enthusiastic bloggers have decided to make it official:
for a regular "Question Time" to keep the candid debates coming. But is it wise to try to replicate last week's spontaneity on a regular
basis? The impressive roster of both conservative and liberal bloggers
signing the petition say yes. Others aren't so sure.
- Join Us! Politics Daily's David Corn is a bit giddy about the bipartisan blogging effort: "It's
hard to imagine all of us agreeing on anything (except perhaps
John Edwards' future in politics)," he writes. "But we had an idea that
ideology--and cable-talk squabbling and blogosphere bickering." He
wants readers to know they are not "naive,"and realize a regular
Question Time could become a"canned replay of pre-existing spin." Nevertheless, he sees "value" in "calling on our elected representatives to show us their best stuff on a regular basis."
- Everyone Wins, urges conservative Ed Morrissey, another co-signer of the petition. Last week, "Obama got a chance to look
presidential and to get away from scripted responses. His presence
there forced the media to cover the substantial policy proposals from
the GOP caucus, coverage that had been all but nonexistent before now. "
- God Save the Queen? The "Question Time" idea is modeled on "Prime Minister's Questions," Tim Cavanaugh reminds us. This ritual grew up in a totally different governmental system. Instead of creating a new institution in the U.S. to do nothing in particular--"nobody
came away from the q&a with any new information or
insight into the Health Care Reform debate, or the stimulus, or any
other topic other than the loveliness of Wisconsin Rep. Paul Ryan's
family," argues Cavanaugh--why not simply add it to the State of the
Union? "There's nothing in the Constitution saying that the president
can't field questions during the ... address." He's all for improving
the current SOTU format.
- And It Doesn't Even Really Work in the U.K., Either The Awl's Alex Balk points out that Question Time is "a good idea unless you've seen how Question Times actually work in
parliamentary democracies, where members of the governing parties ask
self-serving softballs (e.g., 'Do you agree with me that the American
worker is the hardest worker in the world?') designed to run out the
clock, while the opposition party tosses up as many cheap shots as it
can in hopes that something will stick."
Want to add to this story? Let us know in comments
or send an email to the author at
hhorn at theatlantic dot com.
You can share ideas for stories on the Open Wire.