should tell you something that the winner of the CPAC straw-poll--used
as a crude gauge of the conservative favorite for president--had been
Mitt Romney for three previous years. This year, despite murmurs of a
, the most votes went to anti-tax libertarian Ron Paul.
Paul won 31 percent, Romney 22 percent, and Sarah Palin clocked in way
behind with 7 percent of the votes.
The first reactions are quick to
dismiss Paul's victory, arguing it's not an accurate reflection of establishment sentiment or Paul's odds in 2012.
- Sends Message to Palin--From Students Ben Smith, Politico
notes the poll for "What there wasn't: A groundswell for Palin." He
argues this wasn't a representative sample because only a third of CPAC
attendees voted, and "half the voters were students."
- No Message--Paul Always Wins Polls Charles Johnson at Little Green Footballs
yawns at another victory for Paul's "anti-war isolationist
paleolibertarian" worldview. He dismisses the results, writing "There's
never been a poll Ron Paul couldn't win, unless you count a presidential primary race."
- Proves Worthlessness of Straw Polls Erick Erickson
of Red State reports the news with many undercutting phrases. He
follows up news of Paul's win saying, "Winner rarely get the eventual
GOP nomination." He notes the CPAC crowd booed at the news and
concludes, "We can thank Ron Paul for showing just how worthless straw
- Bodes Further Irrelevance of CPAC Polls Jonathan Martin of Politico
writes Paul-supporters made a particular push to win the straw poll.
What's more surprising, he suggests, is "the inaction of others"
including Romney. He concludes, "These results won't augur well for
future cpac s polls."
Want to add to this story? Let us know in comments
or send an email to the author at
bcarlson at theatlantic dot com.
You can share ideas for stories on the Open Wire.