When Jon Stewart addressed President Obama as "dude" Wednesday night,
the media backlash
was swift and intense. How dare this tiny fake newsman talk to The
American President like they were old boarding school roommates? The
outrage was not shared by The New Republic's Jonathan Chait
, who explained
why Stewart's comment brings us one step closer to the Founders' dream of a
society where all elected officials are known as dude, bro, and broseph.
(But not king. Never king.) Writes Chait:
I think the office of
the president has too much dignity. The president is a citizen who
serves the public. It is in the interest of the president to make
himself into something exalted, a national father figure and symbol of
the government. But the public has no interest in this function, which,
indeed, can take on monarchical trappings with an insidious
anti-democratic undertone. (It's a little disturbing when people who see
the president salute -- a military signal that suggests subordination.)
I don't want to see presidents cutting their own rap videos or jumping
into the ring with professional wrestlers. But at the moment, and for
the foreseeable future, out problem is not too little presidential
dignity but too much.
Chait's words, needless to say, will not help
Stone Cold Steve Austin's 2012 White House bid.
Want to add to this story? Let us know in comments
or send an email to the author at
rgustini at theatlantic dot com.
You can share ideas for stories on the Open Wire.