The Senate voted to repeal Don't Ask, Don't Tell on Saturday by 65 to
31, with eight Republicans joining against the Clinton-era policy. The
bill will go to President Obama for his signature next week and is
expected to be implemented by the Pentagon in 2011. President Obama has
made ending the policy a priority since his 2008 presidential campaign
but had struggled to see it through. Though he had the support of the military,
Republicans successfully blocked several attempts at repeal. Obama
infuriated many supporters with his failure to break the delays and
especially when the White House actually pushed to have DADT reinstated after a federal judge ruled it to be unconstitutional. But now Democrats have finally won this long-sought victory for civil rights. Here's what repeal will mean.
- Implementation Matters In the Atlantic, Ben Heineman gives
"a brief look at how the Pentagon proposes to handle some of those
controversial issues raised about gay and lesbian integration." He looks
over the plans for everything from protecting the rights of gay
servicemembers to addressing the religious objections of those within
the military opposed to repeal. But the bottom line is leadership
matters. "The key to successful implementation is, of course, leadership
because the military is a command and control organization."
- Vindication of Obama's Political Strategy The Atlantic's Andrew Sullivan chronicles,
"Like 2009's removal of the HIV ban, which was as painstakingly slow
but thereby much more entrenched, this process took time. Without the
Pentagon study, it wouldn't have passed. Without Obama keeping Lieberman
inside the tent, it wouldn't have passed. Without the critical
relationship between Bob Gates and Obama, it wouldn't have passed. It
worked our last nerve; we faced at one point a true nightmare of nothing
... for years. And then we pulled behind this president, making it his
victory and the country's victory, as well as ours."
- Will This Ease Tension Between White House and Liberals?
Not just because repeal was a major priority of the left, but because
it shows Obama's strategy wasn't the "betrayal" some thought it to be.
The Washington Post's Greg Sargent writes,
"Today's victory stands as partial vindication of his strategy. Getting
the tax deal wrapped up early made the time for repeal, with only days
left in the lame-duck session. This is an important victory for the
White House in another way. It will quiet all the talk about Obama's
supposed 'triangulating,' because it demonstrates -- for the time being,
anyway -- that even as the White House sees a need to trade away some
core liberal priorities to compromise with Repubilcans, Obama seems to
want to bring the left along with him, to whatever degree he can. This
will make it tougher to argue that Obama's strategy is to deliberately alienate the left in order to win back the middle of the country."
- Legal Fight Not Over for Gay Rights in Military Andrew Cohen writes
in The Atlantic that this "doesn't mean the end of two-tiered justice
for gay or lesbian service members." There's another federal law in
their way. "now that the Pentagon will finally be recognizing the
existence of such service members in its ranks, it will also as a matter
of law and logic be recognizing the existence of same-sex partners or
same-sex spouses. But those folks are barred by the federal Defense of
Marriage Act from receiving some of the benefits that opposite-sex
partners or opposite-sex spouses would receive from the military."
- Ivy Colleges Should Reinstate ROTC The Weekly Standard's William Kristol notes
that some Ivy League colleges had blocked reserve officer training
corps programs because of DADT. He says that the incoming Republican
Congressmen should "take an interest in ensuring that discrimination
against ROTC on college campuses ends. ... One trusts the presidents and
trustees of colleges that have been keeping ROTC at arm's length,
allegedly because of DADT, will move posthaste to ensure a hearty
welcome and full equality for ROTC at their universities." Politico's Ben Smith reports that they are doing exactly that.
Want to add to this story? Let us know in comments
or send an email to the author at
mfisher at theatlantic dot com.
You can share ideas for stories on the Open Wire.
User Comments
Please type your comment and click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be prompted to log in or register